Fire Extinguishing System Phase Control for Safety and Gas Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fire extinguishing systems in enclosed spaces face challenges in achieving the required extinguishing gas concentration quickly and safely, posing risks to personnel and requiring large, costly installations to meet time constraints for achieving the extinguishing effect within 10, 60, or 120 seconds.

Innovation Solution

The system divides the gas flooding process into a pre-flooding phase with a predefined gas concentration below the NOAEL value and a main flooding phase, allowing immediate gas introduction during the alarm period, ensuring personnel safety and reducing the need for large gas supplies by extending the flooding time, and optionally using different gas compositions during each phase.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional fire extinguishing systems introduce large amounts of extinguishing gas quickly to achieve required concentration within 10, 60, or 120 seconds, then the extinguishing effect is achieved, but personnel safety is compromised and large, costly installations are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate of achieving extinguishing gas concentrationVSAvoidrisk to personnel safety
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The gas flooding process is divided into two distinct phases: a pre-flooding phase during the alarm period where gas is introduced at a controlled rate below NOAEL concentrations, and a main flooding phase after evacuation where gas is introduced at full rate to achieve extinguishing concentration. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by allowing safe, controlled introduction during the alarm period and rapid achievement of extinguishing concentration after personnel have evacuated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by introducing extinguishing gas at a safe, controlled rate during the alarm period (pre-flooding phase) before full evacuation is complete. This preliminary introduction establishes a safe baseline concentration that prevents harmful effects to personnel while preparing the system for rapid achievement of full extinguishing concentration once the alarm period ends.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If conventional systems use large gas supplies to achieve quick extinguishing concentration, then the extinguishing effect is achieved, but the system cost and installation size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to achieve extinguishing concentrationVSAvoidamount of extinguishing gas required
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the flooding process into pre-flooding and main flooding phases, the system optimizes gas usage. During the pre-flooding phase, gas is introduced at a lower rate, and during the main flooding phase, the remaining gas is introduced more efficiently. This segmentation reduces the total gas quantity required compared to conventional systems that must provide for worst-case rapid flooding scenarios throughout the entire response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the gas introduction rate based on the operational phase. During the alarm period, the introduction rate is controlled to maintain concentrations below NOAEL. After the alarm period, the rate increases to achieve full extinguishing concentration. This dynamic adjustment optimizes both time and gas quantity by matching the introduction rate to the actual needs of each phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Quantity of substance

If the system extends the flooding time to reduce gas usage, then gas quantity is reduced, but the time to achieve extinguishing concentration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamount of extinguishing gas requiredVSAvoidtime to achieve extinguishing concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic action by structuring the flooding process into distinct time periods with different introduction rates. The pre-flooding phase operates at a controlled, lower rate, followed by the main flooding phase that operates at a higher rate to achieve full concentration. This periodic structure resolves the contradiction by allowing extended initial flooding at safe rates while maintaining the capability for rapid completion when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of gas introduction rate based on the operational phase. During pre-flooding, the rate is limited to maintain safety concentrations. During main flooding, the rate parameter is increased to achieve rapid achievement of extinguishing concentration. This parameter change allows the system to optimize both gas quantity and time by adapting the introduction rate to current conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables earlier achievement of the extinguishing gas concentration, reduces gas usage, and allows for smaller pressure relief systems, enhancing safety and cost-effectiveness while ensuring effective firefighting and preventing re-ignition.

Implementation Method 1

Such extinguishing gases extinguish fires by essentially displacing the atmospheric oxygen from the site of the fire

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxygen displacement: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

maintain the extinguishing gas concentration until hot surfaces cool down enough so that deep-seated fires will be extinguished

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat absorption: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS10052509B2Method for extinguishing a fire in an enclosed space, and fire extinguishing system
Publication Date: 2018.08.21 WAGNER GROUP GMBH
  • US10052509B2 patent drawing
  • US10052509B2 patent drawing
  • US10052509B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a system as well as a method for extinguishing fire in an enclosed room (6) in which the enclosed room (6) is flooded with extinguishing gas at least until an extinguishing gas concentration capable of providing an extinguishing effect (a) is set in the flood zone. In order to achieve the realizing of a maximum extinguishing gas concentration (b) as quickly as possible without the flooding of the room (6) thereby posing a danger to people, it is inventively provided for the flooding of the enclosed room (6) to be divided into a pre-flooding phase and a main flooding phase subsequent thereto. The pre-flooding phase corresponds to an interval of time between the time (t1) the alarming starts to warn people of impending danger and a predefined time (t2). The main flooding phase corresponds to an interval of time between the predefined time (t2) and the time (t4) at which a maximum extinguishing gas concentration (b) is reached. The enclosed room (6) is flooded such that during the entire pre-flooding phase, the concentration of extinguishing gas in the enclosed room (6) does not exceed a predefined or predefinable value for the extinguishing gas employed which is below the critical NOAEL value.