Fire Management System Using Swarm Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fire detection and management systems are inefficient due to reliance on human observation, limited sensor coverage, and uncoordinated asset operations, which can lead to delayed detection and ineffective containment of wildfires, especially in challenging environments like wilderness areas.

Innovation Solution

A fire management system that integrates information from a heterogeneous group of vehicles and data sources, including autonomous sensors, to analyze and coordinate the operation of various assets as a swarm, predicting fire progression and directing assets for efficient detection and containment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If satellites and sensors are used to detect fires, then detection capability is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the monitoring area into multiple zones and uses multiple distributed sensors to detect fires in different locations simultaneously. Each sensor independently monitors its local area, and the control system integrates information from all sensors to achieve comprehensive fire detection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed to handle multiple types of sensors and data sources universally, integrating information from temperature sensors, smoke detectors, and other detection devices through a unified processing framework that can manage heterogeneous data formats and protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Area of stationary object

If more sensors are deployed to cover large areas, then detection coverage is improved, but deployment time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring coverage areaVSAvoiddeployment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from two-dimensional ground-based sensor deployment to three-dimensional monitoring by placing sensors at multiple elevations including ground level, tree canopies, and tower-mounted positions, achieving broader area coverage without proportionally increasing the number of sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts sensor activation and data collection frequency based on environmental conditions and fire risk levels, optimizing resource utilization and reducing the effective deployment time needed for comprehensive monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If human observation methods are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but detection reliability decreases due to operator limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoiddetection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system operates autonomously to detect and report fires without requiring continuous human observation. The control system automatically processes sensor data, identifies fire conditions, and triggers alerts, eliminating dependence on human operators while maintaining system simplicity through automated decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces human visual and cognitive observation mechanisms with electronic sensors and automated processing systems. Temperature sensors, smoke detectors, and image analysis algorithms substitute for human senses, providing reliable detection independent of operator fatigue, time of day, or environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Area of stationary object

If satellites are used for fire detection, then large area monitoring is improved, but observation window and reliability decrease due to cloud cover

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring areaVSAvoiddetection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Ground-based and tower-mounted sensors serve as intermediaries between the environment and the detection system, providing localized fire detection that complements satellite observations. These intermediate sensors can detect fires through cloud cover and provide continuous monitoring regardless of satellite pass schedules or weather conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed sensor network provides preliminary fire detection at the local level before satellite overpasses occur, enabling early warning and continuous monitoring that is not dependent on satellite observation windows or weather conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of fire detection and containment by providing real-time data analysis and coordinated asset operations, improving coverage and response times, especially in difficult conditions such as darkness, smoke, or mountainous terrain.

Implementation Method 1

Satellites may be used to provide information about infrared radiation that may be emitted by fires

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared radiation detection: Infrared Radiation

Data Source

PatentEP2511888B1Fire management system
Publication Date: 2018.12.26 THE BOEING CO
  • EP2511888B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2511888B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2511888B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method and apparatus for managing fires. A control system is configured to receive fire related information from at least a first portion of a plurality of assets and analyze the fire-related information to generate a result. The control system is configured to coordinate an operation of a second portion of the plurality of assets using the result.