Fire Resistant Composite Mat for Lightweight Sandwich Constructions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for lightweight, strong, and VOC-free sandwich constructions with high flame resistance to replace existing prefabricated walls and panels, which are often heavy, prone to water damage, and emit formaldehyde.

Innovation Solution

A composite mat comprising woven or non-woven fibers, a polymeric binder, and a fire-resistant additive, such as organophosphorus compounds or borate salts, applied as a laminate or dispersed throughout the fibers, which can be used in sandwich constructions without formaldehyde or styrene, and with a thermoplastic polymer film and clear coat for enhanced performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional fiberglass reinforced plastics and plywood are used for sandwich constructions, then structural strength and rigidity are achieved, but the construction becomes heavy and prone to water damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidconstruction weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite mat made of cellulosic fibers (such as wood fibers, bast fibers, or agricultural residues) bound with a polymeric binder and fire-resistant additives. This composite material provides structural strength comparable to traditional fiberglass and plywood while being significantly lighter and more resistant to water damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material composition parameters by using cellulosic fibers instead of fiberglass, and employs specific polymeric binders (such as polyvinyl acetate, polyurethane, or epoxy resins) with controlled fiber-to-binder ratios to achieve the desired strength-to-weight ratio while maintaining light weight properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional prefabricated walls and panels are used, then structural integrity is maintained, but formaldehyde emissions and VOC release occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidformaldehyde emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs fire-resistant additives (such as borates, phosphates, or metal hydroxides) within the composite mat that create a chemically inert environment resistant to combustion and decomposition, preventing the release of harmful formaldehyde and VOC emissions while maintaining structural integrity under various conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses naturally derived cellulosic fibers (such as wood fibers, agricultural residues, or paper products) as renewable, biodegradable materials that replace synthetic fiberglass and plywood, providing structural integrity without the harmful chemical emissions associated with traditional materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If fire-resistant additives are added to the composite mat, then flame resistance is improved, but the complexity of material composition increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame resistanceVSAvoidmaterial composition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines fire-resistant additives (such as borates, phosphates, or metal hydroxides) directly into the polymeric binder matrix during the manufacturing process, creating a homogeneous composite material where fire protection and structural functions are merged into a single integrated material system, simplifying application despite the enhanced functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses polymeric binders that serve multiple functions: providing structural binding between fibers, offering fire resistance through inherent flame-retardant properties or additive incorporation, and ensuring water resistance. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate treatment layers or additional materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Weight of moving object

If cellulosic materials are used in sandwich constructions, then lightweight and environmental friendliness are achieved, but flame resistance is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction weightVSAvoidcombustion susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the naturally occurring cellulosic structure, which is inherently combustible, into a fire-resistant material by incorporating fire-resistant additives (such as borates, phosphates, or metal hydroxides) that chemically modify the fiber-binder matrix, transforming the material's response to fire from combustible to flame-retardant while preserving the lightweight cellulosic base.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite mat where cellulosic fibers (providing lightweight structure) are combined with polymeric binders and fire-resistant additives, forming a multi-phase composite material that simultaneously achieves light weight, structural integrity, and flame resistance through the synergistic interaction of its components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composite mat provides excellent flame resistance, preventing combustion of core materials and allowing the use of cellulosic materials, while eliminating formaldehyde and styrene emissions, resulting in a lightweight, strong, and environmentally friendly construction solution.

Implementation Method 1

the fire resistant additive can be an organophosphorus compound, a borate salt, a melamine compound, an aluminum compound, and antimony compound

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlame retardation:

Implementation Method 2

preventing combustion of core materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentEP3374576B1Fire resistant composite mat
Publication Date: 2020.09.09 BASF SE
  • EP3374576B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

Disclosed herein are flame resistant composite mats. The composite mat contains a fiber, fire resistant additive, and a binder. The mats are useful in the production of flame resistant sandwich constructions.