Fire-Resistant Glazing With Differential Ply Stiffness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fire-resistant glazings lack improved resistance to fire performance, necessitating enhanced protection against fire in various applications.

Innovation Solution

A fire-resistant glazing laminate comprising at least three transparent plies and two transparent fire-resistant layers, where each outer ply has a bending stiffness 1.5 to 15 times greater than the inner ply, achieved through varying modulus of elasticity, thickness, and edge profile combinations, with intumescent materials and optional plastics films for improved mechanical stability and heat resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional fire-resistant glazing with uniform ply thickness is used, then the structure is simple to manufacture, but the fire resistance performance and mechanical stability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire resistance performanceVSAvoidlaminate structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The glazing is divided into multiple plies (at least three) with different thicknesses, where outer plies have greater thickness than inner plies. This segmentation allows each layer to serve specific functions: outer plies provide mechanical strength and fire resistance, while inner plies provide additional protection. The differentiated thickness configuration optimizes both fire performance and mechanical stability without requiring overly complex manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different plies within the laminate are assigned different thicknesses based on their functional requirements. Outer plies are made thicker (1.5 to 15 times greater bending stiffness) to handle mechanical loads and provide primary fire barrier, while inner plies can be thinner as they are protected by the outer layers. This local differentiation of quality optimizes overall performance while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If outer plies have significantly greater bending stiffness than inner plies, then mechanical stability and impact resistance improve, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical stabilityVSAvoidply thickness control
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention specifies that outer plies should have bending stiffness 1.5 to 15 times greater than inner plies, providing a quantitative parameter range that guides manufacturing. This parameter specification allows manufacturers to achieve the desired mechanical stability while managing precision requirements through defined tolerances. The range accommodates variations in material properties and manufacturing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If more fire-resistant layers are added to improve fire resistance, then fire protection performance increases, but the device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire protection performanceVSAvoidnumber of layers
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fire-resistant glazing uses at least two fire-resistant layers positioned between the plies, with each layer serving specific fire protection functions. The segmentation of fire resistance across multiple layers provides enhanced protection while maintaining a manageable structure. Each fire-resistant layer works synergistically with the differentiated ply thickness configuration to achieve optimal fire performance without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides enhanced mechanical stability and fire resistance, maintaining structural integrity and reducing the likelihood of glass breakage during installation, while offering improved fire protection and impact resistance, with specific embodiments demonstrating superior performance in fire tests compared to conventional glazings.

Implementation Method 1

each of the transparent fire-resistant layers comprises an inorganic intumescent material which swells or foams (intumesces) on exposure of the glazing to fire to form a barrier layer that is resistant to the passage of hot gases and flame as well as heat conduction and radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIntumescent material expansion: Intumescent Materials

Implementation Method 2

The intumescence is often accompanied by a cooling effect and the release of water vapour from the intumescent material-both of which serve to reduce heat conduction through the glazing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWater vapour release: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS20250010585A1A fire-resistant glazing
Publication Date: 2025.01.09 PILKINGTON GRP LTD
  • US20250010585A1 patent drawing
  • US20250010585A1 patent drawing
  • US20250010585A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A fire-resistant glazing includes at least three transparent plies and at least two transparent fire-resistant layers wherein each fire-resistant layer is an interlayer for two plies and each outer ply has a bending stiffness between 1.5 and 15 times greater than a bending stiffness of at least one inner ply. In one aspect, each outer ply has thickness from 0.20 mm to 16.00 mm greater than the thickness of the at least one inner ply.