Fire-Resistant Rubber Hose Composition With Maintained Burst Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current railway hoses face challenges in meeting stringent fire safety standards like EN 45545-2 while maintaining conventional performance criteria such as burst pressure, cold flexibility, and oil resistance, as increased fire-retarding additives often compromise physical properties.

Innovation Solution

The development of reinforced hoses with a tube and cover layers composed of elastomeric blends like chlorinated polyethylene and chlorosulphonated polyethylene, or ethylene vinyl acetate rubber, combined with a flame-resistant composition and curing system, which includes ingredients like antimony oxide and silica, to meet EN 45545-2 and EN854 type 2TE standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fire-retarding additives are increased to meet fire safety standards, then fire resistance is improved, but physical properties deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire resistanceVSAvoidphysical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite rubber formulations combining multiple elastomers (EPDM, NBR, SIR) with specific fire-retarding additives (antimony oxide, zinc borate, magnesium hydroxide) to achieve both fire resistance and maintained physical properties. The composite approach allows synergistic effects where each component contributes to either fire safety or mechanical performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the concentrations and ratios of fire-retarding additives to achieve the required fire resistance while minimizing negative impacts on physical properties. Specific parameter ranges are established for additives like antimony oxide (2-5 phr) and zinc borate (5-15 phr) to balance fire safety with mechanical performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If fire-retarding additives are increased to meet fire safety standards, then fire resistance is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire resistanceVSAvoidformulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops universal rubber compositions that simultaneously satisfy multiple requirements: fire resistance (EN 45545-2), mechanical strength, flexibility, and processability. The formulated compounds serve multiple functions through integrated design of elastomer blends and additive packages, reducing the need for separate optimization of each property

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If fire-retarding additives are increased to meet fire safety standards, then fire resistance is improved, but processing difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire resistanceVSAvoidprocessing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully controls the dosage and combination of fire-retarding additives to maintain proper processing characteristics. The formulation parameters are optimized to ensure the rubber remains processable through standard extrusion and molding operations while achieving the required fire resistance levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The hoses achieve high fire resistance, low smoke density, and maintain excellent physical properties, including burst pressure and flexibility, while adhering to stringent fire safety and performance standards.

Implementation Method 1

a peroxide/sulfur curing system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVulcanization: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

The flame-resistant package may include one or more ingredients selected from the group consisting of antimony oxide, zinc molybdate/magnesium silicate complex, magnesium aluminum hydroxy carbonate, and aluminum trihydroxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEndothermic decomposition: Endothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentUS11643539B2Fire resistant rubber compositions and hose
Publication Date: 2023.05.09 CONTITECH USA INC
  • US11643539B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Hoses include a tube, a reinforcement layer disposed outwardly from the tube, and a cover layer disposed outwardly from the reinforcement layer. The cover layer may be based on a first elastomeric blend of a first chlorinated polyethylene and chlorosulphonated polyethylene, a first flame-resistant composition, and a peroxide/sulfur curing system. The tube may be based upon a second elastomeric blend of a second chlorinated polyethylene and ethylene vinyl acetate rubber, a second flame-resistant composition, and a peroxide curing system. The first flame-resistant package and the second flame-resistant package includes one or more ingredients selected from the group consisting of antimony oxide, zinc molybdate/magnesium silicate complex, magnesium aluminum hydroxy carbonate, and aluminum trihydroxide. In some aspects, the hoses meet the testing performance requirements of EN 45545-2, HL2/R22 category standard, and EN854 type 2TE standard.