Fire Training Chamber Venting for Safe Flashover Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fire training systems using gaseous gas cannot safely simulate a 'flashover' scenario due to the risk of uncontrolled combustion of liquid gas accumulating at the bottom of the fire chamber, posing an accidental and uncontrollable fire situation.

Innovation Solution

A fire training system with a fire unit connected to a gas supply unit, featuring a first outlet for gaseous gas and a second outlet for liquid gas, where the second outlet is positioned to allow liquid gas to flow into the fire chamber floor within a predetermined radius, equipped with openings to disperse the gas outside and sensors to monitor and control the combustion process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If liquid gas is used to simulate fire with higher energy density, then larger flames and flashover scenarios can be simulated, but liquid gas accumulates at the bottom of the fire chamber leading to uncontrolled combustion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidcontrol of combustion
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful accumulation of liquid gas at the bottom of the fire chamber is extracted and removed through openings in the floor. The system actively removes the dangerous substance (liquid gas) that would otherwise cause uncontrolled combustion, separating the useful function (fire simulation) from the harmful effect (gas accumulation).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The openings in the floor act as intermediaries between the liquid gas and the external environment. Instead of allowing direct accumulation and potential explosion within the chamber, the openings provide a controlled pathway for the liquid gas to escape, mediating between the high-energy fire simulation need and safety requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If gaseous gas is used in the fire unit, then the system is simple to operate, but flashover scenarios cannot be simulated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of gas handlingVSAvoidfire scenario simulation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The fire unit is designed with dual functionality, capable of handling both gaseous gas and liquid gas through separate outlets. This multi-functional design allows the same basic fire unit structure to simulate different fire scenarios (standard fires with gaseous gas, flashover with liquid gas) while maintaining operational simplicity through standardized handling procedures for each gas type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If openings are provided in the floor wall to disperse liquid gas, then unburned gas can escape safely, but gas dispersion control becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of gas dispersionVSAvoidcomplexity of gas dispersion control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The floor wall is segmented with multiple openings distributed across its surface rather than having a single large opening or completely sealed structure. This segmentation allows liquid gas to escape through multiple pathways, improving safety by preventing localized accumulation while distributing the dispersion process across several controlled locations, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system safely simulates 'flashover' by ensuring minimal risk of unburned liquid gas igniting inside the chamber, enhancing firefighter safety through passive and active monitoring and control mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

liquid gas has a higher density than air and/or gaseous gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDensity difference: Density Gradient

Implementation Method 2

the liquid gas can flow out of the fire chamber on its own thanks to the at least one opening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational flow: Gravitation

Implementation Method 3

the fire chamber can be equipped with a sensor for detecting liquid gas or gaseous gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas detection:

Implementation Method 4

the gas flowing out of the first outlet is ignited, whereupon a fire starts in the fire chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentEP4101511B1Fire safety training system
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 DRAGER SAFETY AG & CO KAAA
  • EP4101511B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4101511B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4101511B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a fire training facility (2) with a fire chamber (4) and a fire unit (6) arranged in the fire chamber (4), which is connectable to a gas supply unit (8) and has a first outlet (10) for gaseous gas from the gas supply unit (8), wherein the fire unit (6) has a second outlet (12) for liquid gas from the gas supply unit (8) and the fire chamber (4) has at least one opening (14) in a bottom wall (16) of the fire chamber (4) within a predetermined radius (R1) around the fire unit (6). A gas sensor on or under the bottom wall (16) is able to detect unburned liquid gas or the corresponding type of gas flowing through the opening (14) in the bottom wall (16) of the fire chamber (4).