Firearm Draw Motion Tracking With Skeletal Scoring Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to provide effective and efficient methods for tracking and scoring the body motion of individuals drawing and presenting a firearm, which is crucial for improving speed, accuracy, and consistency in situations requiring quick firearm deployment.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system using a camera to track and analyze the user's body motion, creating a digital wireframe skeleton, comparing it to a stored model, and generating ratings based on speed and accuracy, with feedback for improvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual coaching and observation methods are used to evaluate firearm drawing motion, then instructor availability and subjective assessment are provided, but measurement precision, consistency, and objective data collection are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion tracking precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual observation and mechanical timing devices with computer vision technology and automated image processing systems. The system uses cameras to capture motion and algorithms to automatically analyze skeletal positions, replacing subjective human assessment with objective computational analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates digital wireframe representations (skeletal models) that copy and represent the physical human body's motion. These digital models allow for precise measurement and comparison of motion parameters without requiring physical contact or complex instrumentation on the subject.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive motion analysis is implemented to improve scoring accuracy, then measurement precision increases, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescoring accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the body into segmented skeletal components (bones, joints, limbs) that can be independently tracked and measured. This segmentation allows for precise measurement of specific motion parameters (arm angle, elbow position, draw speed) while using modular computational approaches to analyze each segment separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms physical motion parameters into digital measurement parameters through image processing. By converting physical quantities (position, velocity, angle) into pixel coordinates and computational variables, the system achieves precise measurement while using standard computer vision algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If real-time feedback is provided to improve learning speed, then productivity increases, but device complexity and processing speed requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning efficiencyVSAvoidreal-time processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated feedback mechanisms that provide real-time or near-real-time evaluation of drawing motion. The system compares measured parameters against ideal standards and provides corrective feedback, enabling self-correcting practice without requiring constant instructor intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes predetermined ideal motion models and scoring criteria before the actual measurement process. These pre-programmed standards allow for rapid comparison and immediate feedback during practice sessions, eliminating the need for complex real-time decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If detailed motion parameters are tracked to improve assessment accuracy, then measurement precision increases, but loss of information and data management complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoiddata management burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates comprehensive digital copies of motion data that can be stored, retrieved, and analyzed without losing information. The skeletal wireframe representations and associated measurement data provide a complete digital record of each drawing motion for later review and comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250381444A1System and method for electronically tracking and scoring motion in drawing a firearm
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 SHOT MENTOR LLC
  • US20250381444A1 patent drawing
  • US20250381444A1 patent drawing
  • US20250381444A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system facilitates analysis and scoring of user motion in drawing and presenting a firearm for discharge. The system receives video image of a user drawing, presenting, and discharging a firearm, generates a user skeletal wireframe model in real time and displays the user skeletal wireframe model overlaid on video image of the user in real time. The system identifies the firearm discharge by detecting sound associated with the firearm discharge or firearm position. The system analyzes the movement of the user in drawing, presenting and discharging the firearm and generates a movement score corresponding to the accuracy of user motion in drawing, presenting and discharging the firearm. The system analyzes the user elapsed time drawing, presenting, and discharging the firearm and generates a time score for the user. The system generates a shot score based on the movement score and the time score.