Dual Independent Safety Mechanism for Firearm Trigger Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current safety mechanisms for firearms, such as semi-automatic and automatic weapons, do not provide an independent additional safety feature that can be controlled mechanically or electronically, leading to potential accidental shootings, especially in training environments where inexperienced users may inadvertently switch the selector to the firing position.

Innovation Solution

A dual safety system is introduced, comprising a manual safety and an additional independent safety mechanism that can be controlled by the user or remotely, ensuring the weapon remains in a safe state unless both safeties are in the firing position, with the additional safety being actuated quickly and efficiently to prevent accidental firings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a manual safety mechanism is used to block trigger movement, then shooting is impeded when in safety position, but the weapon can still be accidentally discharged if the selector is mistakenly switched to firing position

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety reliabilityVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The safety mechanism is divided into two independent components: a manual safety selector and an additional independent safety mechanism. Each safety can independently block the trigger, so that even if one safety is accidentally switched, the other remains functional to prevent accidental discharge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The additional safety mechanism is positioned to preemptively block the trigger path before the manual safety can be accidentally switched to firing position. The safety body is preliminarily arranged in a position that intercepts the trigger's movement path, preventing the trigger from reaching the release point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If an additional safety device is added to intercept the kinematic chain, then accidental shooting is prevented, but space inside the weapon is occupied that could be used for other accessories

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety reliabilityVSAvoidinternal space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The additional safety mechanism is nested within the existing weapon structure, utilizing unused or underutilized spaces. The safety body is positioned in a recess or cavity that does not interfere with the weapon's external dimensions or internal accessory mounting areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The safety body moves in a dimension that is orthogonal to the trigger's movement path, allowing it to block the trigger without occupying the same spatial volume. This dimensional approach enables the safety mechanism to be compact and not interfere with other accessories.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If multiple safety elements are added to the weapon, then safety is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety reliabilityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The additional safety mechanism is merged with the existing trigger assembly and selector structure. Both safeties share common mounting points and structural elements, reducing the overall complexity despite adding a second independent safety function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The additional safety mechanism serves multiple functions: it blocks the trigger path, provides an independent safety layer, and can be controlled by both the weapon carrier and a controlling user. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If a controlling user can remotely control the safety position, then safety control is improved for training environments, but the device complexity and control system requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A mechanical linkage or cable system serves as an intermediary between the controlling user and the safety mechanism. This intermediary transmits the controlling user's input to the safety body without requiring complex electronic systems, maintaining simplicity while enabling remote control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent provides options for controlling the additional safety either mechanically (through direct linkage) or electronically (through motors or actuators). This substitution allows flexibility in control system design, enabling remote control while adapting to different complexity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3572761B1Device and method for securing firearms
Publication Date: 2021.04.28 RADE TECNOLOGIAS SL
  • EP3572761B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3572761B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3572761B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The device comprises a trigger and a first safety, the invention focusing on the fact that the device comprises a second safety which actuates independently of the first safety, said second safety comprising an actuating element and a safety body, made from a single piece or independent pieces joined together when they move, such that the second safety determines the state of the weapon, between at least a firing state and safe state. Likewise, the invention relates to the method for securing firearms.