Firearm Lock Housing with Bidirectional Shaft and Cam Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gun safety devices are inadequate in preventing unauthorized use, particularly when coupled with muzzle devices, as they lack robust anti-tampering mechanisms and are vulnerable to brute force, cutting, drilling, and reverse installation attempts.

Innovation Solution

A gun safety device featuring a lock housing with a base component and receptacle, a key structure, and a cam mechanism that includes bidirectional rotatable shafts and arms with tabs to secure the muzzle device, along with a self-protective cage-like structure and a semi-flexible wand to prevent ammunition loading, designed to resist tampering and self-destruct before compromise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a simple lock mechanism is used, then manufacturing costs are reduced, but anti-tampering properties deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costsVSAvoidanti-tampering properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The lock mechanism is divided into multiple independent components including a lock housing, cam mechanism, bidirectional rotatable shaft, and cage-like structure. Each component performs a specific function and can be manufactured separately using standard machining processes, keeping production costs low while the combination provides robust anti-tampering protection through their integrated interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device employs a composite structural approach combining a rigid lock housing with a cam mechanism that creates dynamic locking engagement. The cage-like structure integrates multiple functional elements (shaft, cam, arms) into a unified assembly that provides enhanced security through geometric interlocking rather than relying on material strength alone, maintaining cost-effectiveness while improving anti-tampering properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If a robust lock mechanism with multiple components is used, then anti-tampering properties are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-tampering propertiesVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple security functions are merged into a single integrated lock mechanism. The cam mechanism simultaneously performs locking, securing the muzzle device, and preventing unauthorized manipulation. The bidirectional rotatable shaft combines rotation and translation movements to engage and disengage the locking arms in one continuous motion, reducing the number of separate components needed while maintaining robust anti-tampering properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The lock mechanism is designed with multi-functionality to handle various tampering attempts. The cam mechanism can lock in multiple positions, the cage-like structure provides both physical containment and structural reinforcement, and the bidirectional shaft allows for both secure locking and easy authorized release. This universal design approach consolidates multiple security functions into a single device, reducing overall complexity while enhancing anti-tampering capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the device is designed to resist all tampering methods, then safety certainty is improved, but manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety certaintyVSAvoidmanufacturing costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The device incorporates preliminary anti-action features directly into its structure. The cage-like configuration with its interlocking arms and cam mechanism is designed to automatically defeat tampering attempts before they can compromise the lock. The geometry of the components is arranged to prevent drilling, cutting, and brute force attacks by design rather than requiring expensive specialized materials or complex assembly processes, achieving high safety certainty at standard manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS10190838B2Gun safety device
Publication Date: 2019.01.29 PITTMAN JOHN M
  • US10190838B2 patent drawing
  • US10190838B2 patent drawing
  • US10190838B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for controlling access to a firearm having a barrel with various physical features proximal thereto, including a muzzle device. The device includes a lock housing with a cavity to receive the barrel. The device also includes a lock mechanism shaft coupled to a lock mechanism that is configured for rotational movement upon actuation of the lock mechanism. The lock mechanism shaft is coupled to a cam that moves axially upon rotation of the lock mechanism shaft. A bidirectional rotatable shaft is coupled to the cam and is insertable into the barrel of the firearm. Embodiments described include variants on the use of a plurality of tabs such as arm, tab, and/or housing configurations to receive and grasp the muzzle device, firearm fixed front sights, bead front sights and/or accessories such as, for example, Picatinny rails, vertical or near vertical serrations, cuts and/or grooves located on the distal lateral and ventral regions of the frame and/or slide.