Firearm Retaining Apparatus with Magnetic Lever Tabs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Firearms are often misplaced, leading to them ending up in the wrong hands, and there is a need for a simple and convenient means to securely store them in a specified location.

Innovation Solution

A firearm retaining apparatus comprising a magnetic element enveloped in a covering with tab portions that act as lever arms, reducing the force required to disengage from a magnetic surface, allowing easy removal and secure attachment to a magnet-compatible surface such as a safe wall.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a magnetic element is used to secure the firearm, then the reliability of firearm retention is improved, but the force required to disengage the apparatus increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirearm retentionVSAvoiddisengagement force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The apparatus is segmented into a magnetic element portion and a covering portion with tab portions. The covering acts as a separate component that provides mechanical leverage, while the magnetic element provides secure retention. This segmentation allows the disengagement force to be applied to the covering rather than directly to the magnetic element, resolving the contradiction between strong retention and easy release.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The covering with tab portions serves as an intermediary between the user's hand and the magnetic element. When disengaging, the user pulls on the tab portions which are connected to the magnetic element through the covering, allowing force amplification through the lever arm effect. This intermediary structure enables easy disengagement while maintaining strong magnetic retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Force

If the magnetic element is directly exposed, then the magnetic engagement strength is maximized, but the ease of operation for removal is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic engagement strengthVSAvoidremoval ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The apparatus divides the functional components: the magnetic element provides engagement strength while the covering with tab portions provides ease of operation. The tab portions extend from the covering and can be easily grasped and pulled, making removal simple without compromising the magnetic element's engagement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The covering acts as an intermediary structure that connects the magnetic element to the user's hand during removal. The tab portions of the covering provide a convenient grip point, allowing users to easily remove the apparatus without directly handling the magnetic element itself, thus maintaining both strong engagement and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the magnetic element is protected by a covering, then the safety and protection of the magnetic element is improved, but the complexity of the device structure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic element protectionVSAvoidapparatus structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The covering is made as a thin, flexible structure that wraps around the magnetic element to provide protection. This thin-film approach offers adequate protection against damage and contamination while adding minimal structural complexity to the overall apparatus design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The covering serves multiple functions simultaneously: it protects the magnetic element from damage, provides a surface for attaching tab portions that enable easy removal, and can be made from materials that provide friction grip. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate components, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus effectively secures firearms in a stable position, reducing the risk of misplacement and allowing for easy retrieval, while minimizing the force needed to detach from the magnetic surface, thus providing peace of mind for owners.

Implementation Method 1

The apparatus may retain a firearm or another magnet compatible structure in a stable state in conjunction with a magnet compatible surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

The tab portions may act as lever arms that may reduce the amount of force one must exert in order to disengage the magnetic element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLever: Lever

Data Source

PatentUSRE47531E1Firearm retaining apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.07.23 STEINBOCK MARK D
  • USRE47531E1 patent drawing
  • USRE47531E1 patent drawing
  • USRE47531E1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments provide a firearm retaining apparatus.