Multi-factor firearm safe lock with dual consent and sobriety check

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safe locking systems lack comprehensive security measures to prevent unauthorized access to firearms, particularly when users are under the influence of alcohol or in situations requiring dual consent, as they often rely on single access points that can be easily breached, posing risks for misuse and suicide prevention.

Innovation Solution

A multi-factor locking system requiring two unique keys, biometric authentication from two users, and a code entry, with an optional blood-alcohol sensor to ensure safe access within a predetermined time frame, ensuring dual consent and sobriety before deactivating the lock.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If multiple access points are provided for safe entry, then ease of operation is improved, but security is worsened because only one access point needs to be breached

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of accessVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The safe locking system is segmented into multiple independent access points (keypad, biometric scanner, RFID reader, mechanical key lock), each controlled by separate authentication mechanisms. This segmentation allows each component to maintain security independence while providing multiple entry methods, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If fast access is enabled for middle-of-the-night burglary scenarios, then productivity is improved, but safety is worsened due to adrenaline-induced mistakes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess speedVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification through multiple authentication factors (biometric scan, code entry, key insertion) before granting access. This preliminary action ensures that even in high-stress situations, the user must complete deliberate verification steps that prevent impulsive or mistaken access, balancing speed with safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The locking system dynamically adjusts the authentication process based on the situation, allowing for programmable time delays or additional verification steps during nighttime hours or when suspicious activity is detected. This dynamic behavior enables the system to maintain security while still providing rapid access when legitimately needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If remote access via mobile application is enabled, then ease of operation is improved, but security is worsened as users can unlock from anywhere in the world

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote access capabilityVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile application serves as an intermediary that requires multiple layers of authentication (Bluetooth connection, Wi-Fi verification, biometric scan, and code entry) before granting remote access. This intermediary layer ensures that even if the safe is remotely accessible, multiple security barriers must be overcome, maintaining security while enabling convenient remote operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11967193B2Multi-factor safe lock
Publication Date: 2024.04.23 COZZA JOE
  • US11967193B2 patent drawing
  • US11967193B2 patent drawing
  • US11967193B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-factor safe locking system for use in firearm storage, wherein the factors comprise a user's provided key, a user's biometric data, and a user's provided code. In some embodiments, the multi-factor safe locking system requires the near-simultaneous entry of two users, or dual consent of the two users to enter at least two unique keys, at least one form of biometric data from each user, and at least two unique codes, wherein each user supplies their own unique code to access the safe's contents. In further embodiments, a safe locking system includes a further factor of a result from a blood alcohol test.