Firearm Sear Mechanism Reducing Trigger Pull Force

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sear mechanisms in firearms require excessive force to trigger discharge and lack tactile feedback, affecting accuracy and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A sear mechanism design featuring a sear lever with a stop surface, a running surface, and an actuator lever with a ramp surface, along with springs to bias these components, providing a pivoting motion that reduces trigger pull force and offers tactile feedback through angular orientations and spring biases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a conventional sear mechanism is used, then the firearm can be discharged, but excessive force is required to pull the trigger

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrigger pull forceVSAvoidtrigger operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The sear mechanism is divided into separate functional components: a sear lever with distinct surfaces (engagement surface, running surface, contact surface) and an actuator lever with corresponding surfaces. This segmentation allows each surface to perform a specific function in the trigger activation sequence, reducing the overall force required by distributing the mechanical interaction across multiple controlled contact points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism employs pivoting motion for both the sear lever and actuator lever, transforming the static engagement into a dynamic sequence. The angularly oriented contact surface on the sear lever works with the ramp surface on the actuator lever to create a controlled pivoting action that reduces trigger pull force while maintaining reliable engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If a conventional sear mechanism is used, then the firearm can be discharged, but tactile feedback is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetactile feedbackVSAvoiddischarge control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanism incorporates an intermediate actuator lever that provides partial action before full discharge. The ramp surface on the actuator lever engages with the angularly oriented contact surface on the sear lever, creating a progressive tactile feedback sequence that allows the user to sense and control the discharge process more precisely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The angularly oriented contact surface on the sear lever works in conjunction with the ramp surface on the actuator lever to provide progressive tactile feedback during trigger activation. This feedback mechanism allows the user to sense the engagement and release sequences, improving control and precision in the discharge process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the trigger pull force is reduced, then ease of operation improves, but reliability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrigger operationVSAvoiddischarge reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanism changes the geometric parameters of the contact surfaces, specifically the angular orientation of the contact surface on the sear lever relative to the running surface. This angular orientation, combined with the complementary ramp surface on the actuator lever, allows for reduced trigger pull force while maintaining reliable engagement through optimized mechanical geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The sear spring provides pre-biasing force on the engagement surface, and the actuator spring provides pre-biasing force on the ramp surface. These spring biases ensure reliable engagement is maintained throughout the reduced trigger pull stroke, cushioning any potential reliability issues that might arise from the lower activation force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces the force required to pull the trigger while enhancing tactile feedback, improving accuracy and reliability by allowing for a more measured discharge.

Implementation Method 1

A sear spring acts on the sear body to bias the engagement surface toward the stop surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring bias: Spring

Implementation Method 2

An actuator spring acts on the actuator lever to bias the ramp surface away from the contact surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring bias: Spring

Implementation Method 3

A sear lever mountable on the frame for pivoting motion about a lever axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPivoting motion: Lever

Data Source

PatentUS11187483B2Sear mechanism and firearm
Publication Date: 2021.11.30 SMITH & WESSON INC
  • US11187483B2 patent drawing
  • US11187483B2 patent drawing
  • US11187483B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sear mechanism for a firearm pivotably mounts a sear body on a sear lever which is pivotably mounted on the firearm frame. An actuator lever is also pivotably mounted on the frame. The actuator lever is pivoted by a trigger bar connected to the firearm's trigger. Pivoting of the actuator lever when the trigger is pulled allows the sear lever to pivot. Pivoting of the sear lever allows the sear body to fall off of a surface on a striker, releasing the striker to discharge the firearm.