Firearm Shot Counter Using Electromagnetic Induction and Dual Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shot counting devices for firearms face challenges in accurately discriminating between live bullet shots, blank shots, and dry-firing actuations due to confusion with other events like impacts or insufficient recoil, and often rely on batteries that can lead to errors and reduced device lifespan.

Innovation Solution

A device with an electronic circuit energized by a magnet and coil system, using a first sensor to detect movement prior to a shot and a second sensor to measure recoil acceleration, allowing for precise discrimination between shot types based on movement direction and speed thresholds, eliminating the need for batteries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a posteriori phenomena (recoil acceleration) are used for shot counting, then the device can detect shots, but it cannot discriminate between live bullet shots and blank shots accurately

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshot discrimination accuracyVSAvoidcounting error rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses a first sensor to detect a priori phenomena (hammer movement, trigger press, safety lever movement) that occur before the shot is fired. This preliminary detection allows the electronic circuit to be activated in advance and enables accurate discrimination between different shot types by analyzing the specific movement patterns before recoil occurs, rather than relying solely on a posteriori recoil acceleration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Duration of action of stationary object

If battery is used to energize the electronic circuit, then the device can operate continuously, but the device lifespan is shortened and counting errors increase due to battery failure or removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice lifespanVSAvoidcounting error probability
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses the weapon's own operational energy (kinetic energy from hammer movement, trigger press, or safety lever movement) to energize the electronic circuit through electromagnetic induction. A magnet coupled to a moving part moves within a coil to generate the required electrical energy, making the device self-powered and eliminating battery-related failures and lifespan limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If energy recuperation from recoil is used to energize the circuit, then battery is eliminated, but the device cannot work when recoil is insufficient (weapon held firmly or very dirty)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation reliability under various conditionsVSAvoidadaptability to different firing conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device can be activated by multiple different a priori phenomena: hammer movement, trigger press, or safety lever movement. This multi-functionality ensures that the device can operate reliably under various firing conditions, including cases where recoil is insufficient, by providing multiple independent pathways to energize the electronic circuit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If a posteriori phenomena detection is used, then the device structure is simpler, but it cannot count dry-firing actuations since no recoil acceleration occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedry-fire detection capabilityVSAvoidsensor and circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device detects dry-firing actuations by sensing the hammer movement or trigger press that occurs before the shot would be fired. Since these a priori phenomena occur regardless of whether ammunition is present, the device can accurately count dry-fires without requiring complex additional sensors, by simply detecting the absence of the expected a posteriori recoil signal while still registering the preliminary activation event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables accurate counting of live bullet shots, blank shots, and dry-firing actuations without confusion with other impacts, ensuring reliable operation across various firearms and reducing the risk of counting errors, even in cases of insufficient recoil or dirty conditions.

Implementation Method 1

an electromagnetic type comprising a coil (4) integrated in the body of the weapon and a magnet (1) integrated in said part of the weapon and designed to be displaced within the coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a second sensor, designed to measure a recoil acceleration when the live bullet shot or blank shot has been fired

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration measurement: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS10866048B2Device for counting live shots, blank shots and dry shots
Publication Date: 2020.12.15 FN HERSTAL SA
  • US10866048B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a device for detecting and counting live bullet shots, blank shots and dry-firing actuation of the striker for all types of semi-automatic or automatic weapons, said device being able to discriminate between said three events and comprising: an electronic circuit; a first sensor for detecting a movement of a part of the weapon preceding a potential live bullet shot or blank shot; and a second sensor for measuring recoil acceleration when the live bullet shot or blank shot has been fired.