Firearm Suppressor Gas Deflector for Noise and Weight Reduction
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional firearm suppressors face issues such as excess heat build-up, gas accumulation, and increased pressure, which can affect the performance of autoloading firearms and reduce noise reduction effectiveness, while also adding length and weight to the firearm.
Innovation Solution
A firearm suppressor design incorporating a gas deflector that deflects gases away from the projectile path, reducing gas accumulation and enhancing noise reduction, and utilizing a central baffle tube and periphery baffle tubes to redirect gases and minimize noise generation.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Object-affected harmful factors
If conventional suppressor design with baffled or tortuous pathway is used, then noise reduction is improved, but gas accumulation and heat build-up increase
Solution Approach 1:
The suppressor is divided into multiple chambers (first chamber, second chamber, third chamber) separated by baffles, with each chamber serving a specific function in gas management and noise reduction. The deflector chamber is further segmented by a deflector element that divides the chamber into first and second portions, creating multiple flow paths for exhaust gases.
Solution Approach 2:
A deflector element is introduced as an intermediary component within the deflector chamber to redirect exhaust gases away from the projectile path. This deflector acts as a mediator between the high-pressure exhaust gases and the projectile, preventing gas accumulation in the projectile path while maintaining noise reduction effectiveness.
2Object-affected harmful factors
If suppressor internal volume is maximized for noise reduction, then noise reduction is improved, but suppressor length and weight increase
Solution Approach 1:
The suppressor employs a nested chamber configuration where the second chamber is positioned within or adjacent to the first chamber, and the third chamber is integrated with the second chamber. The deflector chamber is nested within the overall suppressor structure, allowing multiple functional chambers to occupy compact space efficiently.
Solution Approach 2:
The suppressor design transitions from a linear elongated structure to a more compact three-dimensional arrangement with chambers positioned in multiple spatial dimensions. The deflectors and baffles create complex internal flow paths that utilize vertical and radial spaces rather than only longitudinal extension.
3Object-affected harmful factors
If suppressor internal volume is maximized for noise reduction, then noise reduction is improved, but suppressor weight increases
Solution Approach 1:
The suppressor employs a nested chamber configuration where the second chamber is positioned within or adjacent to the first chamber, and the third chamber is integrated with the second chamber. The deflector chamber is nested within the overall suppressor structure, allowing multiple functional chambers to occupy compact space efficiently.
Solution Approach 2:
The suppressor utilizes composite construction methods, potentially combining different materials with varying properties for different chambers and components. The deflector element and baffles may be made from materials optimized for their specific functions, balancing weight, heat resistance, and acoustic properties.
4Productivity
If exhaust gases are tapped for autoloading operation, then autoloading performance is improved, but gas pressure within suppressor increases
Solution Approach 1:
A port is provided in the second chamber that communicates with the exhaust gas tap of the firearm, allowing a controlled portion of exhaust gases to be extracted for operating the autoloading mechanism. This extraction occurs at a specific location within the suppressor where pressure has been partially reduced, minimizing the impact on overall suppressor pressure.
Solution Approach 2:
The suppressor design creates different local conditions within various chambers, with the second chamber specifically configured to provide exhaust gases at reduced pressure for autoloading operation. The deflector chamber and its components are locally optimized to manage gas flow and pressure distribution, allowing different regions to serve different functions.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The suppressor design effectively reduces noise emissions, improves operating performance of autoloading firearms, and minimizes length and weight, while maintaining effective noise reduction and reducing the likelihood of gas accumulation.
Implementation Method 1
a deflector extending from the projectile entrance cantilevered outward into the deflector chamber, and the deflector extending along a central axis of the suppressor. In this way, gases flowing to the suppressor at the projectile entrance may be deflected by the deflector away from a path of a projectile through the suppressor
Implementation Method 2
When in action, firearm suppressors lower the kinetic energy and pressure of the propellant gases and thereby reduce the decibel level of the resultant noises. Suppressor design(s) utilize static geometry to induce pressure loss across the device by means that may include rapid expansion and contraction
Implementation Method 3
Typical suppressor design approaches used to optimize firearms noise reduction include maximizing internal volume, and providing a baffled or tortuous pathway for propellant gas egress
Data Source
AI summary
Methods and systems are provided for firearm sound suppressors including a gas deflector. In one example, a suppressor comprises a housing, a projectile entrance, a projectile exit, one or more baffles, and a deflector chamber. The deflector extending outward from the housing and the deflector curving around a central axis of the suppressor.