Aerial Firefighting Dump Gate Linkage for Precise Retardant Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Firefighting aircraft dump gate systems using hydraulics are heavy, introduce dynamic system complexities, and face maintenance and reliability issues, necessitating an improved control system for efficient fire retardant delivery.

Innovation Solution

A gatebox system with an electrically driven mechanical gate system, utilizing a box assembly with hinged gates, crank arms, and connecting links to control fluid flow, incorporating an electric motor, gear reduction, and a servo-motor with a control system for precise angular position control, and an emergency dump mechanism for manual operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a hydraulic control system is used to operate the dump gate, then the gate position control is reliable and substantial forces can be applied, but the system weight increases and maintenance complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate position control reliabilityVSAvoiddump gate system weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the hydraulic mechanical system with an electric motor-driven system. The electric motor (18) connects through a transmission (62) to drive the drive shaft (12) that operates the gates (8, 10). This substitution eliminates heavy hydraulic components (pump, actuators, reservoir, pipes) while maintaining the ability to apply substantial forces to control the dump gates, thereby reducing system weight while preserving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If a hydraulic control system is used to operate the dump gate, then the gate position control is reliable, but the system complexity increases and maintenance issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate position control reliabilityVSAvoiddynamic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the complex hydraulic system with a simpler electric motor-driven mechanical system. The electric motor (18) with transmission (62) eliminates the need for hydraulic pump, actuators, reservoir, pipes and fittings, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining reliable gate position control through the drive shaft (12) and crank arm (22) mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes the hydraulic subsystem components (pump, actuators, reservoir, pipes, fittings) from the dump gate system, retaining only the essential mechanical elements (electric motor, transmission, drive shaft, crank arms, connecting links) needed for gate operation. This extraction reduces overall system complexity while preserving the core function of reliable gate control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Force

If a hydraulic control system is used to operate the dump gate, then substantial forces can be applied to the gates, but the system weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate control forceVSAvoiddump gate system weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the hydraulic force generation system with an electric motor-driven system. The electric motor (18) connected through transmission (62) to the drive shaft (12) generates substantial rotational force to operate the gates (8, 10) via crank arms (22) and connecting links (26, 28). This substitution eliminates heavy hydraulic components while maintaining the capability to apply substantial forces needed for gate control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a dynamic transmission system (62) between the electric motor (18) and the drive shaft (12) that can variable the force output. The transmission allows the motor to deliver high torque when substantial force is needed for gate operation, while enabling lighter overall system weight compared to a hydraulic system designed for the same force requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides efficient, reliable, and precise control of fire retardant flow, reducing weight and maintenance concerns, while ensuring safe emergency operation, enhancing the aircraft's firefighting capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

A first crank arm (22) is fixed to the drive shaft (12) and coupled to the first gate (8) by a first connecting link (26), which defines an over-center geometry while the first gate is at a closed position, such that weight of the fire retardant on the first gate (10) induces torque on the drive shaft (12) in the gates-closing direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 2

rotation of the drive shaft (12) in the gates-opening direction is coupled to the first and second gates (8, 10) by the first and second crank arms (22, 24) and the first and second connecting links (26, 28) to open the first and second gates (8, 10), to thereby enable control of the fire retardant flow from the hopper (4) according to an angular position of the drive shaft (12)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11542742B2Aerial firefighting dump gate system
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 TROTTER VICTOR D
  • US11542742B2 patent drawing
  • US11542742B2 patent drawing
  • US11542742B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gatebox system for delivering fire retardant fluid from a firefighting aircraft. A first and second gate opening are formed through a lower portion of a gatebox. The gates are hingedly connected along edges of the openings. One or two drive shafts in the gatebox are rotatable in gates-closing and gates-opening directions. Crank arms are fixed to the drive shafts and coupled to the gates by connecting links, which define an over-center geometry while the gates are at a closed position, such that weight of the fluid on the first gate induces torque on the drive shaft in the gates-closing direction. Rotation of the drive shafts in the gates-opening direction enables control of the fluid flow from the hopper according to an angular position of the drive shaft.