Firefighting Vehicle Cooling Using External Fluid Heat Exchange

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Firefighting vehicles face challenges in maintaining component temperatures within safe operating ranges due to heat generation during operation, especially in hot environments, with existing cooling solutions being inadequate.

Innovation Solution

A cooling system that utilizes firefighting fluid to cool vehicle components by directing it through liquid-to-liquid heat exchangers and closed-loop paths, with working fluid being circulated to cool internal equipment and exhausted through sprayers for external cooling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If conventional cooling systems are used in firefighting vehicles, then the vehicle can operate in normal conditions, but the components overheat in hot environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent operating temperatureVSAvoidcooling system effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The firefighting fluid supply system serves dual purposes: extinguishing fires and cooling vehicle components. The same fluid conduit that delivers water to the fire also provides cooling fluid to the heat exchanger, eliminating the need for a separate cooling fluid supply and ensuring cooling availability whenever firefighting operations are conducted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

A liquid-to-liquid heat exchanger acts as an intermediary between the firefighting fluid supply and the vehicle's internal cooling circuits. The heat exchanger transfers thermal energy from hot vehicle components to the flowing firefighting fluid without direct contact between the fluids, enabling efficient heat removal while maintaining system isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Temperature

If firefighting fluid is used for cooling, then components are cooled effectively in hot environments, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent cooling effectivenessVSAvoidcooling system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is merged with the existing firefighting fluid supply infrastructure. The heat exchanger integrates with the fluid conduit already present for fire suppression, and the cooling circuit combines with the fire suppression control system, reducing overall system complexity despite the added cooling capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The firefighting fluid supply system performs multiple functions: fire suppression and component cooling. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate cooling fluid storage and delivery systems, reducing structural complexity while maintaining effective cooling performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If cooling fluid is drawn from the firefighting fluid supply, then cooling is available during fire operations, but the firefighting fluid flow is diverted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling availabilityVSAvoidfirefighting fluid delivery
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The liquid-to-liquid heat exchanger serves as an intermediary that allows heat transfer without fluid mixing or direct diversion. The firefighting fluid flows through the heat exchanger's external passages, transferring heat to the vehicle's cooling circuit while maintaining its primary flow path toward the fire, minimizing disruption to firefighting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling system is segmented into a separate closed-loop circuit that interfaces with the firefighting fluid supply through the heat exchanger. This segmentation allows independent optimization of both the firefighting fluid flow for fire suppression and the cooling circuit flow for component temperature control, minimizing interference between the two functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Components are maintained at safe operating temperatures even in extreme heat, ensuring effective cooling and protection of the vehicle's drivetrain and other critical components.

Implementation Method 1

directing cooling fluid through a liquid-to-liquid heat exchanger that exchanges heat between the cooling fluid and a working fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

exhausting the cooling fluid through a set of sprayers that cool external portions of the vehicle and/or surroundings of the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporative cooling: Evaporative Cooler

Implementation Method 3

exhausting the cooling fluid through a set of sprayers that cool external portions of the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 4

conveying the working fluid within a closed-loop path that cools a plurality of equipment within the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPumping: Pump

Data Source

PatentUS12558952B2Vehicle cooling using external fluid source
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 HOWE & HOWE INC
  • US12558952B2 patent drawing
  • US12558952B2 patent drawing
  • US12558952B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A technique for providing cooling in a firefighting vehicle leverages the availability of firefighting fluid for cooling the vehicle's components. By tapping into a conduit or manifold that receives firefighting fluid to be sprayed toward a fire, an amount of cooling fluid is drawn and directed through one or more liquid-to-liquid heat exchangers, for providing cooling of the vehicle's components.