Fireproof Alkali Silicate Layer Dehydration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The preparation of intumescent materials for transparent fire-resistant glazing using hydrated alkali silicates is hindered by lengthy drying processes and differences in composition and properties between drying and gelation methods, leading to constraints on thickness and performance.

Innovation Solution

A dehydration step is introduced before application, reducing water content and drying time by controlling pressure and temperature, allowing for thicker layers with improved homogeneity and fire resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the intumescent material is prepared by drying a silicate solution, then the layer achieves good fire resistance and transparency, but the preparation time is extremely long (several tens of hours)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire resistanceVSAvoidpreparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the water content parameter from the traditional 25-38% range to a higher range of 38-45%, which fundamentally alters the drying kinetics and final material properties, achieving both reduced drying time and maintained fire resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies a preliminary drying step before the main drying process, where the silicate solution is pre-dried to reduce water content partially, then subjected to controlled drying to achieve the final water content of 25-38%, significantly reducing the total drying time required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If the water content in the silicate layer is increased to reduce drying time, then the preparation time is shortened, but the creep temperature decreases and fire resistance is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrying timeVSAvoidcreep temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The preliminary drying step concentrates the silicate solution before the main drying process, ensuring that when the final water content of 25-38% is achieved, the material has already developed sufficient structural integrity to maintain high creep temperature and fire resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention optimizes the water content parameter to a specific range of 25-38% after the two-stage drying process, which is the critical threshold that maintains both reduced drying time and high creep temperature above 800°C

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the silicate solution is applied in a thicker layer to reduce the number of applications, then the processing efficiency is improved, but the drying time increases much more than proportionally to the thickness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoiddrying time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The preliminary drying step performs the most time-consuming dehydration work before the main drying process, allowing thicker layers to be processed efficiently since the bulk of water removal occurs in the controlled preliminary stage rather than during the final drying

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The drying process is segmented into two distinct stages: preliminary drying that handles the bulk water removal, and main drying that achieves the final water content. This segmentation allows thicker layers to be processed without exponentially increasing total drying time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If additives such as glycerol or ethylene glycol are added to improve mechanical properties and prevent bubble formation, then the optical quality is improved, but the fire resistance is reduced due to the organic compound content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical qualityVSAvoidfire resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the water content parameter to a higher range of 38-45% in the initial solution, which alters the drying kinetics and reduces the need for organic additives to control bubble formation, thereby maintaining fire resistance while still achieving good optical quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly shortens the overall processing time, enables the production of thicker, more homogeneous intumescent layers with enhanced fire resistance and optical quality, while maintaining the benefits of dried materials, resulting in cost-effective and lightweight fire-resistant glazing.

Implementation Method 1

A dehydration step is introduced before application, reducing water content and drying time by controlling pressure and temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDehydration: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

These must be materials that offer good protection when the glazing is exposed to fire. This is achieved by expanding into a refractory foam that protects against the spread of both flame and radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIntumescent expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 3

The silicate solution with its additives is spread on a horizontal support and the assembly is subjected to prolonged drying in an enclosure swept by a hot gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentEP2480410B1Layer of fireproof alkali silicate
Publication Date: 2019.08.07 AGC GLASS EUROPE SA
  • EP2480410B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for producing a hydrated alkaline silicate layer for fireproof glass panel, in which a pre-prepared fluid composition is applied onto a glass sheet and is then subjected to drying at a controlled temperature and hygrometry until a solid layer, in particular having the desired water contents, is produced, wherein the drying in question is preceded by a dehydration step.