Virtual Firewall Packet Flow Segmentation for Control Traffic Priority

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In ultra-high throughput computing environments, race conditions and hot spots in packet processing lead to processor overload, causing network interface card resets, delays in critical control packets, and disruptions in services, particularly in virtualized firewalls lacking physical ASIC support.

Innovation Solution

A virtual firewall system divides packet traffic into fast and slow paths, allocating dedicated resources and vCPUs to each path, ensuring timely processing of critical control packets while tolerating some data packet drops, using multi-stage parallel data plane development kit processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If packets are processed using receiver side scaling (RSS) with hashing traffic, then packet distribution across processors is improved, but hot spots and processor overload occur causing race conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacket processing throughputVSAvoidprocessor load balance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments packet processing into two distinct paths: fast path for session-matched packets and slow path for packets requiring firewall stack processing. This segmentation prevents hot spots by distributing different packet types to different processing paths, eliminating the race conditions that occur when all packets compete for the same processor resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different processing qualities to different packet paths. The fast path receives prioritized processing with dedicated resources for time-sensitive control packets, while the slow path handles regular data packets with standard processing. This ensures critical packets get the quality of service they need without overwhelming the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If dedicated security processor and content processor are used for IPsec and IPS operations, then security processing capability is improved, but processor overhead increases in virtualized environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity processing capabilityVSAvoidprocessor management overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the network security appliance functionality within the virtual machine environment. Instead of requiring physical dedicated security processors, the virtual firewall implements security processing functions (IPsec, IPS) as software components that run on standard virtualized processors, eliminating the need for complex hardware management in virtualized environments while maintaining security capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If receive queue (RXQ) is shared for all packets, then queue utilization is improved, but critical control packets are dropped when data traffic overflows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequeue utilization efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol packet delivery
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the receive queue into separate queues for fast path packets and slow path packets. The fast path queue is dedicated to time-sensitive control packets and is protected from overflow by data traffic. The slow path queue handles regular data packets. This segmentation ensures that even when the system is under heavy load, critical control packets in the fast path queue are not dropped due to overflow of the shared queue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If all packets are processed through the firewall software stack, then processing accuracy is improved, but processing latency increases and system throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacket processing accuracyVSAvoidpacket processing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-establishing session information in the session table before packets arrive. When packets arrive, the fast path can immediately match them against the pre-computed session information without requiring full firewall stack processing. This preliminary preparation allows the system to achieve high-speed processing for established connections while maintaining the accuracy of full processing when needed for new sessions or suspicious traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260067252A1Performance optimizations and traffic flow control for packet processing in a firewall
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 FORTINET INC
  • US20260067252A1 patent drawing
  • US20260067252A1 patent drawing
  • US20260067252A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Packet traffic flow control includes receiving a packet, by a first virtual machine network security appliance (VMNSA), and determining whether the packet is to be processed by a first path or a second path; in response to determining that the packet is to be processed by the first path, processing the packet by a first traffic flow controller (TFC) of the VMNSA, forwarding the packet by the first TFC to a first transmitter, and sending the packet by the first transmitter; and in response to determining that the packet is to be processed by the second path, processing the packet by the first TFC, forwarding the packet by the first TFC to a second TFC of the VMNSA, processing the packet by the second TFC, forwarding the packet by the second TFC to a second transmitter, and sending the packet by the second transmitter.