Dynamic Fishing and Hunting Prediction System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for predicting fishing and hunting conditions are limited by static analysis of environmental data, failing to effectively determine optimal times for these activities.

Innovation Solution

A fishing and hunting prediction system that utilizes a server with a prediction application, data store, and various data sources to process user profile data, waypoint data, and environmental data, generating forecasting models for optimal fishing and hunting conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If static analysis of environmental data is used, then system complexity is reduced, but prediction accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static environmental data analysis to dynamic forecasting models that continuously update predictions based on real-time data inputs. The forecasting models dynamically adjust to changing conditions, incorporating temporal variations in environmental parameters to improve prediction accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where prediction results are continuously refined based on actual fishing and hunting outcomes. User feedback and actual results feed back into the forecasting models, allowing the system to learn and improve accuracy over time without requiring proportional increases in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If personalized user attributes are integrated, then prediction relevance is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction relevanceVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by customizing predictions according to individual user attributes such as preferred fishing methods, target species, and location preferences. Each user receives tailored forecasts based on their specific needs rather than generic predictions, improving relevance while using efficient filtering and matching algorithms to manage data processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting prediction criteria and weighting based on user attributes. Different users have different parameter thresholds and preferences that are dynamically applied to the same environmental data, allowing personalized relevance without requiring separate processing systems for each user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If real-time data processing is implemented, then prediction timeliness is improved, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction timelinessVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic action by updating forecasts at optimized intervals rather than continuously processing data in real-time. Forecasting models are refreshed at strategically determined intervals based on data availability and environmental stability, maintaining prediction timeliness while significantly reducing computational resource consumption compared to continuous processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary action by pre-processing and pre-calculating forecasting models based on available data patterns. Historical data and established environmental relationships are pre-computed into predictive algorithms that can be quickly executed with minimal real-time computational resources, balancing timeliness with resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12201106B2Fishing and hunting prediction system and method
Publication Date: 2025.01.21 CHASINFINS INC
  • US12201106B2 patent drawing
  • US12201106B2 patent drawing
  • US12201106B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fishing and hunting prediction system and method. The fishing and hunting prediction system may include a server, including a fishing and hunting prediction application, a controller, operating memory, and a communications interface, and wherein the server is accessible via a network. The fishing and hunting prediction system may further include, a data store in communication with the server; one or more data sources, wherein the one or more data sources are accessible to the fishing and hunting prediction application via the network; and wherein the controller is configured to execute stored program instructions, that may include providing access to a user; receiving user profile data; receiving waypoint data for one or more waypoints; receiving data from the one or more data sources; processing the received data; and generating fishing and hunting forecasting models based on the processed data.