Fitness Activity Verification System Using Probability Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fitness tracking systems are vulnerable to falsified activity reports, as users may manipulate data by attaching devices to pets or machines, leading to inconsistencies between reported and actual physical activity levels.

Innovation Solution

An activity tracking system that verifies workout reports by gathering data from multiple sources, including participant history, device characteristics, and aggregate data from similar users, to determine the probability of authentic activity completion, using a probability matching algorithm to generate a verification score.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If users report activity data using portable devices, then activity tracking capability is improved, but data authenticity deteriorates due to potential manipulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity tracking capabilityVSAvoiddata authenticity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring multiple parameters (GPS location, accelerometer data, heart rate) and comparing them against expected patterns for genuine physical activity. When discrepancies are detected, the system flags the activity report for review or automatically rejects it, creating a closed-loop verification process that maintains data authenticity while enabling widespread activity tracking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The server acts as an intermediary between the portable device and the activity database. It receives activity reports from devices, performs comprehensive verification using multiple data sources and analysis algorithms, and only authenticates genuine activities to the database. This intermediary layer prevents fraudulent data entry while preserving the convenience of self-reported activity tracking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple data sources are used for verification, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity verification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification system is segmented into distinct functional modules: GPS tracking module, accelerometer analysis module, heart rate monitoring module, and pattern recognition module. Each module independently processes specific types of data and contributes to the overall verification decision. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high verification accuracy through multiple data sources while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The portable device is designed with multi-functionality, integrating GPS receiver, accelerometer, heart rate sensor, and communication capabilities into a single device. This universal device can perform multiple functions (tracking location, monitoring motion, measuring physiological data) without requiring separate specialized equipment, thereby improving measurement precision while avoiding the complexity of multiple separate systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8983637B2Determining authenticity of reported fitness-related activities
Publication Date: 2015.03.17 UNDER ARMOUR INC
  • US8983637B2 patent drawing
  • US8983637B2 patent drawing
  • US8983637B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An activity tracking system is configured to receive an activity report identifying a fitness-related action that is reported to have been completed by a participant. Upon receipt of the activity report, the activity reporting system verifies the workout, e.g., by obtaining data that can be used by the activity reporting system to determine whether the activity report represents actual activity as reported by the participant or, in the alternative, suspect activity. Based on the data obtained from the one or more data sources and the information in the activity report, the activity tracking system determines a probability that the activity report represents legitimate fitness activity. This probability determination may then be output or reported to other systems (e.g., fitness history databases, websites, and the like, third party systems (e.g., incentive systems, reward systems, and the like).