Five-Point Probe Sheet Resistance Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining sheet resistance, such as four-probe point contact methods, require precise positioning of probes, which is challenging, especially at the microscopic or nanoscopic scale, and do not allow for arbitrary placement of probes.

Innovation Solution

A method using five point probes positioned at selected positions near the edge of a sample, with each probe connected in different configurations to measure resistances, and a data processor calculates sheet resistance using an equation that relates these resistances, allowing for more freedom in probe placement and reducing the need for precise alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If four-probe point contact methods are used, then measurement of sheet resistance is achieved, but precise positioning of probes is required which is challenging at microscopic or nanoscopic scale

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesheet resistance measurementVSAvoidprobe positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines five probe positions into a single measurement system, where the fifth probe provides additional information that compensates for positioning inaccuracies. By merging multiple measurement configurations (different combinations of four probes selected from five), the system achieves robust sheet resistance measurement without requiring precise probe alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of probe quantity from four to five, and utilizes different configurations of these five probes. By measuring resistance across multiple configurations and processing these measurements through a system of equations, the method transforms the measurement approach to eliminate dependence on precise probe positioning while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If five point probes are used with multiple configurations, then freedom in probe placement is increased, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprobe placement flexibilityVSAvoidmeasurement system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The five probes serve multiple functions: each probe can act as current source, voltage source, or reference point in different configurations. This multi-functionality allows the same physical probe arrangement to perform multiple measurement tasks, increasing adaptability without proportionally increasing physical device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement system uses itself to compensate for its own limitations. By taking measurements in multiple configurations and using the redundancy of five probes, the system self-corrects for positioning errors and edge effects, reducing the need for external alignment fixtures or precise positioning mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If four-probe methods are used, then local measurement is achieved, but precision depends on contact arrangement alignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal sheet resistance measurementVSAvoidcontact arrangement alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary measurements in multiple configurations before calculating the final sheet resistance value. By collecting data from all five probe combinations first, then processing through a system of equations, the method eliminates the need for precise alignment during the measurement process itself, as the alignment errors are corrected in the data processing stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement system uses feedback from multiple measurement configurations to correct for alignment errors. The resistance measurements from different probe combinations provide redundant information that feeds into the calculation system, allowing the determination of accurate sheet resistance values even when probe positions deviate from ideal alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides more accurate and flexible determination of sheet resistance by using additional information from five probes, reducing the impact of edge effects and enabling measurements on non-flat surfaces, suitable for micro- and nano-metric dimensions.

Implementation Method 1

measuring a resistance between the four point probes for each configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Resistance: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS11639952B2Method for determining sheet resistance
Publication Date: 2023.05.02 UNIV W BIAYMSTOKU
  • US11639952B2 patent drawing
  • US11639952B2 patent drawing
  • US11639952B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a sheet resistance of a sample (1) by using point probes. The method includes: (a) positioning (101) five point probes (2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e) on the sample (1) at selected positions which are distanced from an edge of the sample (1): (b) connecting (102) the five point probes (2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e) in five configurations wherein each configuration comprises a different set of four point probes (abcd, bcde, cdea, deab, eabc) and measuring (103) a resistance (r1=rabcd, r2=rbcde, r3=rcdea, r4=rdeab, r5=reabc) between the four point probes for each configuration; (c) determining (104) the sheet resistance (ρ0).