Five-Suit Card Deck for Expanded Casino Wagering Options

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional card games, such as baccarat, lack the option for additional wagers beyond the standard bets, limiting player engagement and revenue potential in casinos.

Innovation Solution

A modified deck of cards with five unique suits and thirteen ranks, including themed elements and Chinese gods as face cards, allowing for new side wagers and maintaining similar odds to standard decks, enabling additional betting options without altering the game's core mechanics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a standard deck of cards is used, then the game can be played with traditional rules, but additional wagering options are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewagering optionsVSAvoiddeck structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deck is segmented into five distinct suits instead of the traditional four, with each suit containing thirteen ranked cards. This segmentation allows for multiple wagering dimensions (suit-based, rank-based, and combination wagers) while maintaining the familiar card structure that players already understand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By adding a fifth suit to the traditional four-suit structure, the patent introduces an additional dimension for wagering possibilities. This dimensional expansion enables new bet types such as wagering on specific suit combinations, suit sequences, and interactions between the fifth suit and traditional suits, all while preserving the original game mechanics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If additional side wagers are introduced, then player engagement and revenue increase, but the game structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue potentialVSAvoidgame structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The five-suit deck structure serves multiple functions: it maintains compatibility with traditional card games while simultaneously enabling diverse side wagers. The same deck structure that allows standard gameplay also facilitates suit-based wagers, rank-based wagers, and combination wagers, making the system universally applicable without requiring separate mechanisms for different bet types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of suit quantity from four to five, which exponentially increases the number of possible wagering combinations. This single parameter change enables multiple new wager types without fundamentally altering the dealing, scoring, or winning conditions of the base game, thus increasing revenue potential with minimal structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the deck is modified to enable new wagers, then wagering versatility improves, but compatibility with traditional rules may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveside wager optionsVSAvoidodds consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the fifth suit and its associated cards function specifically for side wagering purposes while leaving the traditional four suits to maintain their standard roles in determining game outcomes. This localized differentiation allows the modified deck to support both traditional gameplay and new wagering options with distinct functional qualities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The additional fifth suit provides more cards than strictly necessary for traditional gameplay, creating an 'excessive' element that is specifically utilized for side wagering. This partial modification approach allows the core game to proceed with traditional odds while the extra cards enable supplementary wagering opportunities that do not interfere with base game probability structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9345950B2Baccarat game with side wagers
Publication Date: 2016.05.24 LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP
  • US9345950B2 patent drawing
  • US9345950B2 patent drawing
  • US9345950B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A new deck of cards and a method of facilitating a card game with said new deck of cards are provided. The method including receiving a set of wagers from a player on an outcome of a card game played using a deck of cards, the deck of cards including five groups of cards, each group of card represented by a unique suit and thirteen cards within each group of cards, the thirteen cards each having a unique rank, wherein the unique ranks include one of ace or one, the numbers two through ten, and three face cards, dealing the cards of the deck of cards according to one or more rules characterizing the card game and providing a return based on the outcome of the card game with respect to the set of wagers.