Fixed-Fin Mandibular Splints for Precise Jaw Advancement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mandibular advancement devices face challenges in consistently and precisely transferring prescriptions due to manual fabrication methods, leading to issues with durability, patient comfort, and compliance, as well as exposure to residual monomers and size limitations.

Innovation Solution

Digitally designed and milled mandibular advancement devices comprising upper and lower splints with fixed fin positions, allowing for accurate increments of mandible advancement without adjustment screws or straps, using CAD processes and materials like PEEK or acrylate polymers for improved durability and comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual artisanal fabrication methods are used to create mandibular advancement devices, then customization for each patient is possible, but manufacturing precision and consistency are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecustomizationVSAvoidprecision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual artisanal fabrication with digital design and automated manufacturing processes. Digital impressions and CAD software enable precise customization while automated milling ensures consistent manufacturing precision, eliminating the trade-off between customization and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the manufacturing parameters from manual techniques to digital parameters. By using digital models with precise measurements and automated milling parameters, the system achieves both high customization (through digital patient-specific modeling) and high manufacturing precision (through automated controlled processes).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If adjustment screw mechanisms are used for mandibular advancement, then titration capability is provided, but device complexity and number of components increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetitration capabilityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the adjustment screw mechanism entirely from the device. Instead of having a complex adjustable system, the invention uses a fixed-position advancement device that is customized digitally for each patient, eliminating the need for screws, blocks, and adjustment mechanisms while maintaining titration capability through digital design variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than providing adjustment capability through movable components (screws and straps), the invention inverts the approach by providing fixed-position advancement devices in a series of different advancement amounts. The titration is achieved by selecting among multiple fixed-position devices rather than adjusting a single device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple components, straps, and screws are used in device design, then adjustability is achieved, but durability and reliability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadjustabilityVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges all the separate components (screws, straps, blocks, fins) into a single integrated custom-milled device. This unified structure eliminates the reliability issues associated with multiple components that can loosen, break, or fail, while the digital customization maintains the necessary adjustability through patient-specific design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention segments the titration function into multiple discrete fixed-position devices rather than using a continuous adjustment mechanism. Each device is a complete, simple, durable unit optimized for a specific advancement amount, eliminating the need for complex adjustable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual fabrication with monomer layering is used, then device customization is possible, but patient exposure to residual monomers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecustomizationVSAvoidresidual monomer exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the chemical monomer layering process with automated digital milling of pre-cured polymer blocks. This substitution eliminates the harmful residual monomers associated with manual fabrication while maintaining full customization capability through digital patient-specific modeling and precision milling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses pre-cured polymer blocks as the starting material for fabrication. These blocks are fully cured and stable, eliminating the residual monomer issue entirely. The process transforms these stable blocks into custom devices through mechanical milling rather than chemical curing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

5Strength

If larger device size is used to withstand intraoral forces, then durability is improved, but patient comfort and compliance decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidcomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using patient-specific digital modeling to optimize device size and shape for each individual's oral anatomy. Rather than using a one-size-fits-all larger device, the custom-milled device is precisely sized and shaped to fit the patient's mouth, providing sufficient strength where needed while maintaining comfort through precise anatomical matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the size parameter from fixed (larger for strength) to variable (optimized for each patient). Digital design allows the device dimensions to be precisely tailored to each patient's oral cavity, providing the minimum necessary size for durability while maximizing comfort through precise anatomical fitting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11617677B2Mandibular advancement device
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 PROSOMNUS SLEEP TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11617677B2 patent drawing
  • US11617677B2 patent drawing
  • US11617677B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are mandibular advancement devices comprising an upper splint and a lower splint, where the upper splint comprises one or more upper fins, where each upper fin is located at a distance UD from back of the upper splint; the lower splints comprise one or more lower fins, where each lower fin is located at a distance LD from back of the lower splint; where the position of the upper and lower fins is unchangeable. Also disclosed are methods of reducing partial constriction of airway during sleep for a patient, the method comprising identifying a patient in need thereof; and administering to the patient the disclosed mandibular advancement device. Also disclosed are methods of manufacturing a mandibular advancement device, the method comprising obtaining measurements from a patient's dentition; digitally designing a mandibular advancement device; and milling the mandibular advancement device.