Machining Fixture Force Balancing to Prevent Part Lift-Off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the machining of gas turbine engine components, such as blades and vanes, the forces from grinding tools can cause parts to lift off the fixture, leading to dimensional and geometric tolerances issues, which are often detected late and can be challenging to diagnose, especially with thin material cross-sections and reduced rigidity.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for configuring a machining fixture that involves computing reaction forces at part contact references and modifying clamp forces, clamp positions, part contact reference positions, and machining movements using a model of the part and fixture to prevent negative reaction forces, thereby ensuring accurate machining.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If high-force grinding operations are performed on thin-walled parts, then machining precision can be achieved, but the part may lift off the fixture causing dimensional and geometric tolerance violations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional and geometric toleranceVSAvoidpart lift-off
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary computation of reaction forces at part contact references before actual machining occurs. By analyzing the model of the part and fixture with planned machining movements, the system identifies potential lift-off conditions in advance and adjusts clamp forces or contact reference positions preemptively to prevent tolerance violations during high-force grinding operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system computes reaction forces at part contact references during simulated machining movements and uses this information to modify clamp forces, clamp positions, or part contact reference positions. This feedback loop ensures that negative reaction forces (indicating lift-off) are eliminated while maintaining manufacturing precision throughout the machining process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If multiple datum features are used to fully constrain the part, then positioning accuracy is improved, but the complexity of the fixture increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidfixture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts parameters such as clamp forces, clamp positions, and part contact reference positions based on computed reaction forces. By modifying these parameters rather than permanently complicating the fixture structure, the system maintains positioning accuracy through software-controlled adjustments while avoiding unnecessary mechanical complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Weight of moving object

If weight reduction is achieved through thin material cross-sections, then component performance is improved, but part rigidity decreases increasing susceptibility to lift-off during machining

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart weightVSAvoidpart rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system computes reaction forces at part contact references and uses this information to adjust clamp forces that counteract the lifting forces generated during high-force grinding operations. By applying compensating clamping forces at strategically positioned contact references, the system prevents lift-off of thin-walled parts while maintaining their weight-reduced design and inherent performance benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Data Source

PatentUS20240176322A1Machining Fixture Force Balancing
Publication Date: 2024.05.30 RTX CORP
  • US20240176322A1 patent drawing
  • US20240176322A1 patent drawing
  • US20240176322A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for configuring a fixture for use in machining of sequential parts via a machine tool, for a planned machining movement of the machining element, uses a model of the part and fixture. Respective reaction forces at the plurality of part contact references are computed. Responsive to computation of a negative reaction force at a said part contact reference, a modification is made to a machining parameter.