Fixture Interaction Detection Using Weight Sensors and Cameras

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current inventory management systems in materials handling facilities face challenges in accurately determining user interactions with inventory locations, leading to inefficiencies and increased operational costs due to reliance on human intervention and low confidence data processing.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing weight sensors and cameras to generate interaction data by processing sensor data, including weight changes and image analysis, to determine user interactions such as item picking or placement, with a hypothesis-based approach to improve confidence values and reduce human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If weight sensors and cameras are used to automatically determine user interactions, then productivity and measurement precision are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated interaction determinationVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the inventory location into multiple zones with individual weight sensors, allowing independent measurement and processing of weight changes in different areas. This segmentation enables more precise interaction detection while distributing system complexity across multiple simple sensor units rather than requiring one complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines weight sensor data with camera image data to create a comprehensive interaction detection system. By merging these two data sources, the system achieves higher measurement precision and productivity while managing complexity through integrated processing that leverages the complementary strengths of both sensor types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If hypothesis-based processing is used to improve confidence values, then measurement precision is improved, but processing time and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfidence valuesVSAvoidprocessing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining hypotheses about possible user interactions and their corresponding weight change patterns. This allows the processing system to quickly match observed weight changes against pre-established hypotheses rather than analyzing every possible scenario in real-time, reducing processing time while maintaining high confidence values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The hypothesis-based processing incorporates feedback mechanisms where the system continuously refines its interpretations based on observed data. By comparing predicted weight changes from hypotheses against actual sensor readings, the system can quickly validate or reject interaction scenarios, improving measurement precision without significant time penalty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated sensor processing replaces human intervention, then productivity is improved, but reliability may worsen due to data processing errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoiddata processing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer that translates raw sensor data into meaningful interaction determinations. This intermediary layer acts as a buffer between the sensors and the final decisions, using hypothesis-based processing to interpret weight changes and camera images. The intermediary approach improves reliability by providing a structured, rule-based interpretation method that reduces errors while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual human analysis with automated electronic processing mechanisms. By substituting mechanical human judgment with electronic hypothesis-based processing, the system achieves both high productivity and improved reliability through consistent, error-free data processing that operates continuously without fatigue or distraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances operational efficiency by providing accurate interaction data with higher confidence values, reducing latency and operational costs by minimizing the need for human oversight and improving inventory management processes.

Implementation Method 1

weight sensors and cameras to generate interaction data by processing sensor data, including weight changes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWeight sensing:

Implementation Method 2

weight sensors and cameras to generate interaction data by processing sensor data, including weight changes and image analysis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImage capture:

Data Source

PatentUS11301984B1System to determine user interaction with fixture
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US11301984B1 patent drawing
  • US11301984B1 patent drawing
  • US11301984B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Sensors in a facility obtain sensor data about a user's interaction with a fixture, such as a shelf. The sensor data may include images such as obtained from overhead cameras, weight changes from weight sensors at the shelf, and so forth. Based on the sensor data, one or more hypotheses that indicate the items and quantity may be determined and assessed. The hypotheses may be based on information such as the location of a user and where their hands are, weight changes, physical layout data indicative of where items are stowed, cart data indicative of what items are in the possession of the user, and so forth. A hypothesis having a greatest confidence value may be deemed to be representative of the user's interaction, and interaction data indicative of the item and quantity may be stored.