Flame Arrester Plate Stack Tapering Heat Dissipation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flame arrester designs face challenges in being easily configurable for endurance burn conditions and may introduce flow resistance or pressure drop issues, limiting their effectiveness in preventing flame transmission during sustained burning.

Innovation Solution

A flame arrester design featuring a stack of spaced plates with intermediate plates having tapering peripheries and varying flow apertures, optimized for both flow resistance and heat dissipation, allowing for improved flexibility and performance in endurance burning scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If multiple narrow passages are used to increase heat transfer surface area, then heat dissipation capability is improved, but flow resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipation capabilityVSAvoidflow resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The flame arrester is divided into multiple narrow passages separated by partitions, creating numerous small channels through which the flame must pass. This segmentation increases the total heat transfer surface area while maintaining manageable flow resistance through optimized passage geometry and distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single-dimensional flow path to a multi-dimensional network of passages. By arranging passages in three-dimensional space with varying orientations and intercepting surfaces at different angles, the design maximizes heat transfer surface area without proportionally increasing flow resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If flame arrester is designed for endurance burning, then flame transmission prevention is improved, but flow resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame transmission preventionVSAvoidflow resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the flame arrester have different structural characteristics optimized for their specific functions. The upstream region features narrow passages for flame quenching, while downstream regions have progressively larger passages to reduce flow resistance. Intercepting surfaces are strategically positioned to provide local heat dissipation where most needed for endurance burning resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The passage dimensions, intercepting surface areas, and spacing are carefully optimized to achieve the minimum required flame transmission prevention performance. By adjusting these parameters, the design achieves adequate flame arrest capability with minimized flow resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Temperature

If hood is made movable to release combustion heat, then heat dissipation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion heat releaseVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flame arrester design allows combustion heat to be naturally dissipated through the passage structure itself without requiring external actuation systems. The narrow passages and intercepting surfaces automatically quench flames and dissipate heat through conduction to the passage walls, eliminating the need for movable hoods or emergency release mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces mechanical heat release mechanisms (movable hoods) with a passive thermal management system based on conductive heat transfer through the passage walls. The solid passage structures serve as heat sinks, transferring combustion heat to the surrounding environment without mechanical movement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances the capability to prevent flame transmission while minimizing pressure drop and optimizing flow distribution, effectively managing heat dissipation and maintaining operational efficiency during prolonged burning events.

Implementation Method 1

Flame arresters operate by transferring heat through a thermally conductive body and endurance burning flame arresters release the main combustion heat to the ambient air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

endurance burning flame arresters release the main combustion heat to the ambient air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP3448530B1Flame arresters
Publication Date: 2022.10.26 ELMAC TECH
  • EP3448530B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3448530B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP3448530B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

A flame arrester (1) which includes a stack of spaced plates (3) which include an end plate (30) and a plurality of intermediate plates (31), a first flow passage (20) defined at least in part by an aperture (32) in each intermediate plate (31) and a second flow passage (37) defined between adjacent plates (30, 31), wherein at least a portion of the periphery of the intermediate plates (31) tapers.