Optical Flame Detector Remote Testing via Modulated Signal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In industrial settings, verifying the functionality of optical flame detectors without disrupting safety functions and incurring operational costs is challenging, especially when detectors are mounted in restricted areas and require remote testing over distances.

Innovation Solution

An optical flame detector system that includes multiple sensors and a processor to differentiate between optical energy from real flames and a remote optical test source, using unique modulation frequencies to initiate a test mode without triggering an alarm, allowing for remote and automatic verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a flame detector is tested using conventional methods, then the functionality can be verified, but the safety system must be bypassed causing operational disruption and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame detector functionality verificationVSAvoidoperational continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

An optical test source is introduced as an intermediary device that transmits modulated optical signals to the flame detector through the atmosphere. This mediator enables remote testing without requiring physical access to the detector or bypassing of the safety system, thus maintaining operational continuity while verifying detector functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The optical test source creates a simulated flame signal by transmitting modulated optical energy that mimics the characteristics of real flame radiation. This optical copy allows the flame detector to be tested in its normal operating mode without actual flames present, avoiding safety system bypass while verifying detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If the flame detector operates in normal mode, then it can detect real flames, but it cannot distinguish test signals from actual flame signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame detection accuracyVSAvoidtesting capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The optical test source transmits modulated optical signals with specific periodic patterns that differ from natural flame radiation. The flame detector is configured to recognize these periodic modulation patterns as test signals, enabling automatic test mode activation while maintaining the ability to detect unmodulated real flames in normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the modulation frequency parameter of the test signal to create a distinctive signature that the flame detector can identify. By operating at specific modulation frequencies (e.g., 1-10 Hz) that are characteristic of test sources rather than natural flames, the detector can automatically distinguish between test signals and actual flame events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the test source is placed remotely, then access restrictions are overcome, but the test signal must be detected over long distances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote accessibilityVSAvoidsignal detection distance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The optical test source uses periodic modulation of the optical signal to encode test information that can be detected over long distances. This modulation allows the flame detector to distinguish the test signal from background optical noise and atmospheric interference, enabling reliable detection across tens of meters despite distance-related signal attenuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables remote and automatic testing of flame detectors without disrupting safety systems, ensuring they function correctly and reducing operational costs by distinguishing test signals from real flames, thus ensuring continuous safety system functionality.

Implementation Method 1

receiving optical energy at one or more optical sensors of the flame detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP3347883B1Flame detectors and testing methods
Publication Date: 2020.11.04 GENERAL MONITORS INC
  • EP3347883B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3347883B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3347883B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Exemplary embodiments of a flame detector and operating method. Optical energy is received at one or more optical sensors, and the detector processes the energy to determine whether the received energy is from a known remote test source. If so, the flame detector is operated in a test mode. If the processing indicates that the received optical energy is not a test signal, the flame detector is operated in a flame detection operating mode. The detector processing uses an artificial neural network in an exemplary embodiment in the flame detection operation mode.