Fluid Dispensing Closure With Flame-Mitigation Hole Array

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fluid container closures fail to effectively prevent flame penetration, as they do not meet the ASTM F3429/F3429M-20 requirements for flame mitigation, posing a safety risk.

Innovation Solution

A flame mitigating fluid dispenser design with thicker top wall thickness and smaller, more numerous holes, along with a secure lid mechanism, to inhibit flame intrusion while allowing fluid flow, using a single molded plastic component to ensure safety and ease of use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional closure designs with thin top walls and larger orifices are used, then fluid dispensing is easier, but flame penetration into the container occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame penetrationVSAvoidfluid dispensing
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The top wall is segmented into multiple small holes (e.g., 13 holes arranged in a circular pattern) rather than using a single large orifice. Each hole has a diameter of approximately 0.030 inches or less, and the total combined area of all holes provides sufficient fluid dispensing while the small individual hole sizes prevent flame penetration into the container

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The top wall thickness is locally increased in the dispensing zone to at least approximately 0.090 inches, which is thicker than the rest of the top wall. This localized thickening provides flame mitigation in the critical dispensing area while maintaining overall structural efficiency and not unnecessarily increasing the entire closure's complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the top wall thickness is increased to prevent flame penetration, then flame mitigation improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame penetrationVSAvoidclosure structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flame mitigating features (thickened top wall in dispensing zone, array of small holes) are integrated into a single molded closure structure. The spout, lid, and thickened top wall forming the dispensing zone are all part of one closure component that can be manufactured as a single piece, avoiding the need for multiple separate parts and assembly steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The top wall thickness is selectively increased only in the dispensing zone where flame mitigation is most critical, rather than uniformly thickening the entire top wall. This localized approach provides effective flame protection while minimizing material usage and manufacturing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple small holes are used instead of fewer large holes, then flame arrestment improves, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame propagationVSAvoidhole dimensions and spacing
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The fluid dispensing function is segmented into multiple small holes (e.g., 13 holes) arranged in a circular pattern within the spout. Each hole has a diameter of approximately 0.030 inches or less, and the holes are spaced apart by at least approximately 0.030 inches on the upper surface, creating a pattern that is effective at flame arrestment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The array of precision holes is integrated into the spout structure as a single molded feature. The spout, lid, and hole array are formed as one closure component through injection molding or similar processes, which can produce consistent hole patterns and dimensions at scale, reducing the practical impact of precision requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively prevents flame penetration during endurance and flashback tests, ensuring safety by maintaining structural integrity and preventing fire ignition within the container.

Implementation Method 1

The thickness of the top wall in the dispensing zone is preferably thicker than the thickness of the top wall outside of the dispensing zone... The dispenser configured to attach to the container... mitigating flame infiltration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal resistance: Thermal Insulation

Implementation Method 2

A flame arrestor is a screen that quenches and cools a flame so that it cannot pass through the flame arrestor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlame quenching:

Implementation Method 3

Each hole has a diameter of approximately 0.030 inches or less at the point where the hole meets the lower surface. Each hole is spaced apart from an adjacent hole by at least approximately 0.030 inches on the upper surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS20250368401A1Flame mitigating fluid dispensing closure
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 MOLD RITE PLASTICS LLC
  • US20250368401A1 patent drawing
  • US20250368401A1 patent drawing
  • US20250368401A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A flame mitigating fluid dispenser for controlling flow of flammable fluid from a container while mitigating flame infiltration. The dispenser configured to attach to the container. The dispenser includes a top wall with an upper surface, a lower surface and defining a thickness between the upper and lower surfaces. The top wall has a dispensing zone where the thickness of the top wall is at least approximately 0.090 inches. A plurality of holes are formed in the top wall in the dispensing zone. The holes extend through the thickness. Each hole has a diameter of approximately 0.030 inches or less at the point where the hole meets the lower surface. Each hole is spaced apart from an adjacent hole by at least approximately 0.030 inches on the upper surface. A sidewall is formed on and depending downward from an outer periphery of the top wall.