Flame Resistant Fabric With Face-Side Fiber Placement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for inexpensive, lightweight flame-resistant fabrics that achieve high arc ratings while complying with thermal protective requirements, particularly for NFPA 70E PPE Category 2 protection (≥8 cal/cm2 arc rating). Existing fabrics with inherently flame-resistant fibers are more expensive and less comfortable.

Innovation Solution

The development of flame-resistant fabrics with inherently flame-resistant fibers, where a higher percentage of these fibers are located on the face side of the fabric for thermal and arc protection, and more comfortable, less expensive fibers are located on the body side, improving comfort and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fabrics are made with inherently flame-resistant fibers, then flame resistance and arc rating are improved, but cost and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame resistanceVSAvoidfabric weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating inherently flame-resistant fibers on the face side of the fabric where they provide maximum thermal protection, while using different fiber compositions on the body side. This localized approach ensures flame resistance where most needed while reducing overall fabric weight and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by combining different fiber types (inherently flame-resistant fibers mixed with other fibers) in specific ratios and arrangements. This creates a fabric that achieves the required arc rating and flame resistance through the synergistic properties of the composite structure rather than requiring 100% inherently flame-resistant material throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If fabrics are made with inherently flame-resistant fibers, then flame resistance is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame resistanceVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By concentrating inherently flame-resistant fibers only on the face side of the fabric rather than throughout the entire fabric structure, the patent reduces the total quantity of expensive inherently flame-resistant material needed, thereby lowering cost while maintaining the required flame resistance performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the ratio and distribution of inherently flame-resistant fibers to achieve the minimum necessary arc rating and flame resistance performance. By carefully controlling fiber composition parameters and their spatial distribution, the fabric meets safety standards at the lowest possible material cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If higher percentage of inherently flame-resistant fibers are used, then arc rating is improved, but comfort decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearc ratingVSAvoidcomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent places inherently flame-resistant fibers predominantly on the face side of the fabric where they provide arc and thermal protection, while the body side can use different fiber compositions that prioritize comfort. This spatial separation allows the fabric to achieve high arc ratings without compromising wearer comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed solution achieves the necessary thermal and arc protection while being more comfortable and affordable, with some embodiments achieving NFPA 70E PPE Category 2 protection and maintaining compliance with all thermal protective requirements.

Implementation Method 1

The arc rating value represents a fabric's performance when exposed to an electrical arc discharge... ATPV is defined as the arc incident energy on a material that results in a 50% probability that sufficient heat transfer through the specimen is predicted to cause the onset of second-degree burn injury

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

NFPA 2112 governs the required performance of industrial worker garments that protect against flash fires... all require that the garments and/or individual layers or parts thereof pass a number of different performance tests, including compliance with the thermal protective requirements of having a char length of 4 inches or less (NFPA 2112) or 6 inches or less (ASTM F1506 and NFPA 1975) and of having a two second (or less) afterflame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlame resistance:

Data Source

PatentUS20250154694A1Flame resistant fabrics
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 SOUTHERN MILLS INC

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention relate to flame resistant fabrics formed with inherently flame resistant fibers that provide the requisite thermal and arc protection, that have improved comfort, and that, in some embodiments, are less expensive than other fabrics formed with inherently flame resistant fibers. Improved comfort and lower cost can be achieved by predominantly locating the inherently flame resistant fibers on the front face of the fabric to impart the requisite thermal and arc protection and predominantly locating the more comfortable (and less expensive) fibers on the back face of the fabric positioned next to the wearer. In this way, overall protection of the fabric is maintained while improving comfort. Some embodiments of such fabrics may also achieve NFPA 70E PPE Category 2 protection.