Flame-Retardant Polyurethane Sealing Material

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional polyurethane foams with high water cut-off properties and low density lack flame retardancy, and existing non-halogen foams with low flammability do not meet water cut-off performance standards under 100 mmAq pressure, while solid flame retardants compromise foam quality and liquid phosphate esters cause fogging issues.

Innovation Solution

A polyurethane foam-based flame-retardant sealing material using a polyol component with a hydroxyl-terminated prepolymer, a non-halogen or halogen-containing non-condensed phosphate ester as a liquid flame retardant, and an isocyanate index of 100 to 150, ensuring excellent water cut-off performance and passing FMVSS302 flammability tests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If solid flame retardant (melamine) is used to improve flame retardancy, then low flammability is achieved, but foam state deteriorates and water cut-off performance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflammabilityVSAvoidwater cut-off performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state parameter of the flame retardant from solid to liquid, and specifically selects a liquid phosphate ester-type flame retardant with controlled viscosity (10 to 1000 cSt at 25°C) and molecular weight (200 to 5000) to achieve both flame retardancy and good foam state without compromising water cut-off performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite approach by combining specific polyol components (polyether polyol with hydroxyl value 20-100 and polyester polyol with hydroxyl value 20-100) with liquid phosphate ester flame retardant to create a polyurethane foam system that simultaneously achieves flame retardancy, good foam state, and excellent water cut-off performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If liquid phosphate ester-type flame retardant is used to improve flame retardancy, then low flammability is achieved, but water cut-off performance deteriorates under 100 mmAq pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflammabilityVSAvoidwater cut-off performance under 100 mmAq
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent precisely controls the molecular weight parameter of the liquid phosphate ester flame retardant (200 to 5000) and its viscosity (10 to 1000 cSt at 25°C) to optimize the balance between flame retardancy and water cut-off performance under high pressure conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite polyol system combining polyether polyol and polyester polyol with specific hydroxyl values (20-100 each) to work synergistically with the liquid phosphate ester flame retardant, achieving both flame retardancy and maintained water cut-off performance under 100 mmAq pressure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Object-affected harmful factors

If amount of liquid phosphate ester flame retardant is increased to improve flame retardancy, then low flammability is achieved, but fogging property deteriorates and cloudiness occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflammabilityVSAvoidfogging and cloudiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the molecular weight parameter of the liquid phosphate ester flame retardant (200 to 5000) to achieve sufficient flame retardancy at lower concentrations, thereby preventing fogging and cloudiness that occur with excessive additive amounts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies the principle of partial action by using the liquid phosphate ester flame retardant at optimized moderate levels rather than excessive amounts, achieving adequate flame retardancy (passing FMVSS302) while avoiding the harmful side effects of fogging and cloudiness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The material achieves long-lasting water cut-off performance under 100 mmAq pressure and passes FMVSS302 flammability tests, while maintaining low flammability and preventing fogging, even when compressed with transparent materials.

Implementation Method 1

a polyurethane foam formed from a polyurethane raw material containing a polyol component, an isocyanate... wherein the polyol component contains 80 to 100 parts by mass of a hydroxyl-terminated prepolymer obtained by the reaction of a polyether polyol and an isocyanate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolyaddition reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS10370513B2Flame-retardant sealing material
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 INOAC CORP
  • US10370513B2 patent drawing
  • US10370513B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flame-retardant sealing material comprising a polyurethane foam formed from a polyurethane raw material containing a polyol component, an isocyanate, a water repellent, a flame retardant and the like, wherein the polyol component contains a hydroxyl-terminated prepolymer obtained by the reaction of a polyether polyol and an isocyanate, the water repellent is a polybutadiene polyol or the like, the flame retardant is (1) a non-halogen non-condensed phosphate ester or (2) a halogen-containing non-condensed phosphate ester, which are liquid at ordinary temperature, and the isocyanate index is 100 to 150.