Flame Retardant Composition Without Bromine or Borax

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current flame retardants containing bromine and borax compositions are toxic to humans and the environment, leading to health concerns and regulatory restrictions, necessitating a non-toxic, environmentally friendly alternative.

Innovation Solution

A flame retardant composition comprising ammonium sulfate and disodium hydrogen phosphate, which does not include bromine or borax, is developed in both solid and fluid forms, providing effective fire protection by creating a carbon layer that suppresses oxygen and prevents fire ignition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If flame retardants containing bromine are used, then fire protection effectiveness is improved, but human health and environmental safety deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire protection effectivenessVSAvoidhuman health and environmental safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters by replacing toxic bromine compounds with non-toxic alternatives (ammonium sulfate and disodium hydrogen phosphate), maintaining fire protection effectiveness while eliminating harmful effects on human health and the environment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses readily available, inexpensive salts (ammonium sulfate and disodium hydrogen phosphate) that can be easily applied and do not persist as toxic contaminants, replacing expensive and harmful bromine-based flame retardants

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If flame retardants containing borax are used, then fire protection effectiveness is improved, but environmental safety and sewer system compatibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire protection effectivenessVSAvoidsewer system contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition by substituting borax with ammonium sulfate and disodium hydrogen phosphate, which do not react harmfully with sewer chemicals while maintaining flame retardant effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts potentially harmful borax compounds into beneficial non-toxic salts that are safe for environmental disposal through sewer systems, while maintaining fire protection capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If non-toxic flame retardant alternatives are developed, then human health and environmental safety are improved, but availability and cost-effectiveness may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman health and environmental safetyVSAvoidavailability and cost-effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses inexpensive, readily available salts (ammonium sulfate and disodium hydrogen phosphate) that are easy to manufacture and apply, making non-toxic flame protection cost-effective and widely accessible

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses common salts that are homogeneous in composition and easily integrated into existing manufacturing processes, ensuring consistent performance and ease of production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composition effectively prevents fire ignition in materials, meeting stringent Swedish regulations and demonstrating non-toxicity, with excellent test results on various materials including fabrics, wood, and plastics, while being environmentally friendly and safe for use.

Implementation Method 1

creating a carbon layer that suppresses oxygen and prevents fire ignition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCarbonization: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

creating a carbon layer that suppresses oxygen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxygen suppression: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS8246864B2Flame retardant composition
Publication Date: 2012.08.21 ECOFLAMEPROTECT IN SCANDINAVIA
  • US8246864B2 patent drawing
  • US8246864B2 patent drawing
  • US8246864B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The ecological flame retardant composition is adapted to protect materials that are flammable. No bromine or borax components are included in the composition. The composition has at least one of i) a mixture of ammonium sulphate and disodium hydrogen phosphate and ii) a mixture of water, ammonium sulphate and disodium hydrogen phosphate.