Flame-Retarding Flare Tip With Baffled Down-Firing Combustion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flaring systems emit visible flames and toxic gases, contributing to environmental pollution and climate change, despite their role in safely disposing of waste gases.

Innovation Solution

A flame retarding flare tip with a baffling system and a down-firing burner design that incorporates baffles and an adjustable central pipe to ensure clean, smokeless combustion of gases, reducing visible flames and harmful emissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional flare tips are used to burn waste gas, then waste gas disposal is achieved, but visible flames and toxic gases are emitted causing environmental pollution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisible flames and toxic gases emissionVSAvoidwaste gas disposal effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The flare tip is divided into multiple functional segments: a Coanda body for gas flow control, multiple baffles (first, second, and third baffles) for flame interaction and air mixing, and a segmented structure that allows each component to perform its specific function in reducing visible flames while maintaining disposal effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The baffles act as intermediary elements between the waste gas flow and the environment. These baffles interact with the flame front to promote complete combustion and mix air with the gas stream, serving as a mediator that transforms the harmful direct flame into a controlled combustion process that reduces visible flames and toxic emissions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If steam or air is injected at the flare tip to assist combustion, then combustion efficiency is improved, but device complexity and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidflare tip structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The Coanda body design enables the system to self-regulate gas flow and combustion without requiring external steam or air injection systems. The geometry of the Coanda body naturally controls the gas flow and promotes air mixing, allowing the system to achieve efficient combustion through its own structure rather than requiring additional complex injection equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If the valve body is displaced further from the valve seat to handle higher pressure, then gas discharge capacity is improved, but exit velocity increases causing more intense flames

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas discharge capacityVSAvoidflame intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters of gas flow by using the Coanda body to control flow velocity and direction, and by using baffles to mix air with the gas stream. This transforms the high-velocity discharge into a controlled flow pattern that maintains discharge capacity while reducing flame intensity through enhanced mixing and distributed combustion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The flare tip achieves environmentally friendly and aesthetically pleasing combustion by suppressing flames and smoke, effectively handling both low- and high-pressure gases, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

a Coanda body, that is either free floating or spring-loaded against an outlet or valve seat of a gas pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoanda effect: Coanda Effect

Implementation Method 2

a flare tip comprising a valve body, such as a Coanda body, that is either free floating or spring-loaded against an outlet or valve seat of a gas pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

waste gas is discharged and ignited by a pilot burner to dispose of the waste gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS12460815B2Flame retarding flare tip
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 LIBERTY COMBUSTION TECH LLC
  • US12460815B2 patent drawing
  • US12460815B2 patent drawing
  • US12460815B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flame retarding flare tip, which belongs to the technical field of waste gas treatment resulting from fossil fuel production and aims at solving the technical problem of reducing the appearance of visible and further reducing smoke and gas is provided. According to the flame retarding flare tip, smoked butane, pentane, ethylene, propylene and the like can be subjected to smokeless combustion. Additionally, the flame retarding flare tip can reduce the appearance of visible flames. The invention has the technical scheme that at least a baffling system and at least one tip burner are respectively arranged in parallel in a dual-walled cylinder; the lower end of the cylinder is connected to a flare stack using an adjustable length pipe; an igniter tube is disposed on the portion of the adjustable length pipe that is contained within the cylinder; and a top cover for further preventing the appearance of visible flames and smoke and reduction of toxic gases. The flame retarding flare tip disclosed by the invention is used for treating waste gas resultant from fossil fuel production processes.