Flame-Synthesis of Monolayer Graphene Using Inverse-Diffusion Burners

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for synthesizing carbon-based nanostructures, such as graphene, using flame synthesis face challenges in achieving large-scale production and controlling the growth of high-quality, large-area nanomaterials on substrates.

Innovation Solution

The use of a modified multi-element inverse-diffusion flames (m-IDFs) burner, which comprises an array of stabilized flames forming a uniform flat-flame front, allows for the synthesis of monolayer and nano-defective graphene on metal substrates. This method involves reacting an oxidizer and a fuel in non-premixed, multiple, inverse-diffusion flame burners, with the pyrolysis species directed onto substrates to form coatings or films.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional CVD methods are used to synthesize graphene, then high-quality graphene can be obtained, but the production scale is limited and processing time is long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction scaleVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental synthesis parameters by transitioning from conventional CVD to flame synthesis methodology. This involves using flame temperatures (typically 800-1200°C) instead of controlled CVD temperatures, and using flame chemistry for carbon deposition instead of standard CVD gas-phase reactions. These parameter changes enable faster processing times and larger production scales while maintaining graphene quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the conventional CVD mechanical and chemical vapor deposition system with a flame-based synthesis system. Instead of using standard CVD equipment with controlled gas flows and heated chambers, the invention employs flame synthesis apparatus where carbonaceous materials are synthesized directly in a flame environment, fundamentally substituting the synthesis mechanism to achieve improved productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If flame synthesis is used to produce carbon-based nanostructures, then scalability and cost are improved, but control over growth of high-quality nanomaterials on substrates is challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescalability and costVSAvoidcontrol over growth
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the flame synthesis process into distinct zones and stages: a reaction zone where carbonaceous materials decompose in the flame, a transition zone where carbon species form, and a deposition zone where graphene grows on substrates. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each zone for both scalability and precision control, enabling flame synthesis to produce high-quality graphene with controlled growth characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating specific microenvironments within the flame synthesis system. Different regions of the flame are engineered to have specific temperature profiles, oxygen concentrations, and residence times that are optimized for different stages of graphene formation. This local optimization enables precise control over graphene quality while maintaining the overall scalability of the flame synthesis approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the controlled growth of high-quality graphene structures, including monolayer and nano-defective graphene, with tunable defects, suitable for applications in ultrafiltration, gas sensors, and optoelectronics. The method allows for large-area deposition and is scalable, with advantages in cost and processing time compared to conventional CVD methods.

Implementation Method 1

reacting an oxidizer (e.g., air or O2) and a fuel (e.g., hydrogen and/or hydrogen precursors) in one or more non-premixed, multiple, inverse-diffusion flame burner(s)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

the pyrolysis species exiting the multiple, inverse-diffusion flame burner are directed onto substrates (e.g., metal substrates such as copper) to form coatings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

pyrolysis species exiting the multiple, inverse-diffusion flame burner are directed onto substrates to form coatings, preforms, flakes, films, sheets, plates, discs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeposition: Deposition (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS12286352B2Flame-synthesis of monolayer and nano-defective graphene
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV
  • US12286352B2 patent drawing
  • US12286352B2 patent drawing
  • US12286352B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for the production of carbon-based and other nanostructures are provided.