Flameproof Enclosure Water Level Safety Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In explosion-prone environments, existing flameproof enclosures fail to effectively contain internal explosions or flames within the reactor, potentially transmitting them to the external environment, especially when the water level in reactors falls below a certain threshold, posing a safety risk.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves using sensors to detect water levels and temperatures within the reactor, de-energizing the flame source, such as UV lamps, when the water level or temperature exceeds a pre-established threshold, ensuring the reactor is full of water to contain any potential explosions or flames, utilizing conductivity or flow switches connected to conventional electrical cutoff circuitry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional electrical cutoff circuitry is used to de-energize the flame source, then the reactor can be protected from explosions, but the system complexity increases due to additional sensors and control components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexplosion containmentVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical control systems with a simple water level-based passive safety mechanism. The water itself acts as the containment medium, and the system relies on the physical principle that water suppresses flames and prevents explosions, eliminating the need for complex electrical cutoff circuitry and sensors in many cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The reactor design allows the water to automatically perform the safety function of containing explosions and suppressing flames without requiring active control systems. The mere presence of adequate water provides the protective function, making the system self-protecting rather than requiring external monitoring and control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If mechanical components are minimized in the cutoff system, then the system reliability improves, but the ability to precisely control the flame source de-energization is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes mechanical control components with electrical or electronic sensing mechanisms that can precisely detect water level and temperature conditions. These sensors trigger control circuits that de-energize the flame source through electrical means, providing precise control without relying on mechanical moving parts that could fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces sensors as intermediary devices that detect physical conditions (water level, temperature) and translate them into control signals. These sensors act as mediators between the physical state of the reactor and the control system, enabling precise control while maintaining reliability by keeping the control system separate from the harsh reactor environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If sensors are used to detect water level and temperature, then the reactor safety is enhanced, but the device complexity increases due to additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor safetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs sensors and control systems that serve multiple functions: water level detection, temperature monitoring, flame source control, and safety interlocking. By making components multi-functional, the patent reduces the total number of separate devices needed, thereby enhancing safety while limiting the increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple safety functions into integrated control circuits and sensor systems. Rather than having separate mechanisms for water level detection, temperature monitoring, and flame suppression control, the system merges these functions into a coordinated control architecture that achieves comprehensive safety with fewer discrete components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures the reactor remains safe by maintaining the water level, preventing external transmission of explosions or flames, and minimizing mechanical components, thus enhancing safety and compliance with Ex-d flame protection standards.

Implementation Method 1

using a conductivity or flow switch connected to a contactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConductivity: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS9434625B1System and method for flameproof protected enclosure
Publication Date: 2016.09.06 ATG R&D LTD
  • US9434625B1 patent drawing
  • US9434625B1 patent drawing
  • US9434625B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for containing a flame originating from a flame source within a fluid containing enclosure includes de-energizing the flame source when the fluid falls below a pre-established level or when the water temperature exceeds a pre-established level.