Flare Control Using Wind Data for Continuous Low-Emission Flaring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The oil and gas industry faces challenges in efficiently managing hydrocarbon flaring due to environmental conditions, leading to inefficient combustion and increased emissions, which can result in regulatory issues and operational disruptions.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes wind condition data to control flaring operations by adjusting air supply and flare tip configurations, enhancing gas velocity and dispersion of combustion constituents, allowing for safe and efficient flaring even in unfavorable environmental conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If flaring operations are halted due to unfavorable wind conditions, then emissions are reduced, but productivity and operational continuity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionsVSAvoidoperational continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts flaring operations based on real-time wind condition monitoring. When wind conditions are unfavorable, the system modifies operational parameters rather than halting operations, maintaining productivity while managing emissions through adaptive control of the flaring process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as air supply rates, flare tip configurations, and gas flow rates in response to wind conditions. These parameter adjustments enable continuous operation under varying environmental conditions while optimizing combustion efficiency and emission dispersion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If air supply is increased to improve combustion efficiency, then combustion quality improves, but energy consumption and emissions may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion qualityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback control by monitoring combustion quality indicators and adjusting air supply accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures optimal combustion efficiency while avoiding excessive air supply that would waste energy and increase emissions, maintaining the balance between combustion quality and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by providing just enough air supply to achieve acceptable combustion quality rather than maximum air supply. This approach maintains sufficient combustion efficiency while minimizing energy consumption and associated emissions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If flaring operations are delayed until favorable environmental conditions, then emissions are controlled, but time loss and operational disruption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions controlVSAvoidoperational delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system takes preliminary action by implementing real-time monitoring and predictive modeling of wind conditions. This allows the system to prepare and adjust operational parameters in advance, enabling continuous flaring operations without delays while maintaining emissions control through proactive management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous flaring operations by adjusting parameters rather than interrupting operations. This ensures uninterrupted productivity while controlling emissions through continuous adaptive management of combustion parameters based on real-time environmental conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables continuous and efficient flaring operations by optimizing combustion conditions, reducing emissions, and minimizing operational disruptions, thus improving environmental safety and compliance.

Implementation Method 1

receiving wind conditions data; determining a control action to control a flaring operation at a site using the wind conditions data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWind: Wind

Implementation Method 2

Combustion of hydrocarbon can result various types of emissions, which can include, for example, visible emission, heat energy emission, and smoke

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 3

short chain hydrocarbons such as methane, propane, ethylene, propylene, butadiene and butane, which under ideal conditions can react efficiently with atmospheric oxygen to form carbon dioxide (CO2) and water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS20240288166A1Flaring optimization responsive to wind conditions
Publication Date: 2024.08.29 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US20240288166A1 patent drawing
  • US20240288166A1 patent drawing
  • US20240288166A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method can include receiving wind conditions data; determining a control action to control a flaring operation at a site using the wind conditions data; and issuing the control action to control the flaring operation.