Flare Emissions Control Using Predictive Sensor-Based Decisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Operators of hydrocarbon sites face challenges in accurately determining and optimizing emission costs of flares over both current and future time frames, as existing sensor measurements are insufficient for precise control and optimization of flare operations.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilizes sensor data from sensing units to determine control decisions for controllable elements of the flare, optimizing operations to meet emission thresholds through a model-based approach, including cloud-based computing for advanced data analysis and optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sensor measurements are used to monitor emission costs, then real-time emission data can be obtained, but the accuracy and predictive capability for future emission costs is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission cost determination accuracyVSAvoidfuture time frame prediction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations and predictions of future emission costs using sensor data and predictive models before the actual emission events occur. This allows operators to anticipate future emission costs and adjust flare operations proactively to optimize emission outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A predictive modeling system acts as an intermediary between raw sensor measurements and emission cost determination. The model processes sensor data, incorporates predictive algorithms, and generates accurate future emission cost predictions, bridging the gap between current measurements and future predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If manual monitoring and control of flare operations is used, then operational flexibility is maintained, but optimization of emission costs over future time frames is not achievable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflare operation controlVSAvoidemission cost optimization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where sensor data from flare operations is continuously monitored, processed through predictive models, and used to generate optimized control recommendations. This feedback loop enables automated optimization of emission costs while maintaining operational flexibility through operator review and adjustment capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The predictive modeling system automatically performs emission cost calculations, predictions, and optimization recommendations without requiring manual intervention for each calculation. The system serves itself by continuously processing sensor data and generating optimized control strategies, reducing the burden on operators while improving optimization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If existing sensor measurement systems are used, then current emission monitoring is possible, but sufficient accuracy for control and optimization decisions is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission monitoring capabilityVSAvoidemission cost accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

A predictive modeling system serves as an intermediary layer between existing sensor measurements and emission cost determination. This intermediary processes raw sensor data, applies predictive algorithms, and generates accurate emission cost predictions, enhancing the precision of existing monitoring systems without requiring complete system replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw sensor measurement parameters into meaningful emission cost parameters through predictive modeling. By changing the parameters from basic sensor readings to optimized emission cost predictions, the system achieves sufficient accuracy for control and optimization decisions while maintaining compatibility with existing sensor infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12504167B2Systems and methods for flare control
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 SENSIA NETHERLANDS BV
  • US12504167B2 patent drawing
  • US12504167B2 patent drawing
  • US12504167B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a flare includes obtaining sensor data associated with emissions of the flare from sensors of a sensing unit associated with the flare. The method also includes determining, based on the sensor data, one or more control decisions for at least one controllable element associated with the flare to achieve a control objective for the flare. The control objective is associated with the emissions of the flare. The method also includes generating display data corresponding to the one or more control decisions. The method also includes operating a display device to provide the display data to a user.