Gas Flare Stack Weatherproof Hood and Burner Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas flares used in waste-to-energy projects face challenges such as unpredictability in operation, difficulty in restarting after prolonged standby periods, especially under inclement weather conditions, and low turndown ratios that restrict their ability to handle varying flow rates of flammable gas streams, leading to inefficient destruction of methane and other flammable gases.

Innovation Solution

A gas flare system with a weatherproof protective hood arrangement, a burner arrangement that includes primary and secondary air circuits with regulators, and a control system to monitor and adjust airflow and waste gas composition, ensuring efficient combustion and minimizing nitrogen oxides formation, allowing for automatic startup and operation with high turndown ratios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a gas flare is designed for continuous operation, then it can efficiently destroy flammable gases, but it becomes difficult to restart after prolonged standby periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of flammable gas destructionVSAvoidability to restart after standby
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously circulating gas through the flare stack during standby periods, preventing rainwater and snow accumulation. The weatherproof protective hood arrangement and plenum housing maintain readiness by keeping the combustion chamber clear and the burner arrangement functional, enabling quick restart when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The gas circulation system operates continuously even during standby periods, maintaining a flow of waste gas through the flare stack. This continuous action prevents weather-related blockages and keeps the system ready for immediate operation, resolving the contradiction between continuous operation efficiency and restart reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Ease of operation

If a gas flare operates under inclement weather conditions, then it maintains operational capability, but rain water and snow accumulations prevent startup

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational capability in weather conditionsVSAvoidability to start under weather conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The weatherproof protective hood arrangement and plenum housing provide preliminary protection against rainwater and snow accumulation before these elements can block the burner arrangement. The overhead cap and lateral peripheral shroud create a protective barrier that prevents weather-related startup failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The plenum housing acts as an intermediary chamber between the waste gas source and the burner arrangement, protecting the combustion process from direct exposure to inclement weather. This intermediate structure allows the system to operate reliably under various weather conditions by isolating the critical combustion components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If a gas flare is designed for high capacity, then it can handle maximum flow rates, but it has low turndown ratios that restrict handling varying flow rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaximum flow rate capacityVSAvoidability to handle varying flow rates
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates variable geometry components including adjustable baffle arrangements and controllable burner configurations that allow dynamic adaptation to different flow rates. The turndown ratio is improved by enabling the flare to adjust its effective capacity through movable components rather than being fixed at maximum design capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The burner arrangement is segmented into multiple independently controllable burners, allowing the system to operate at various capacities by activating only the necessary number of burners. This segmentation enables high turndown ratios while maintaining the capability to handle maximum flow rates when all burners are operational.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If flammable gases are burned at high temperatures, then destruction efficiency increases, but nitrogen oxides formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedestruction efficiency of flammable gasesVSAvoidnitrogen oxides production
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes combustion parameters including temperature, residence time, and oxygen concentration to achieve high destruction efficiency while minimizing nitrogen oxides formation. By carefully controlling the combustion process parameters rather than simply maximizing temperature, the system resolves the contradiction between destruction efficiency and harmful emissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The combustion chamber is designed with zones of different temperature and oxygen concentration to optimize both destruction efficiency and emissions control. Different regions of the combustion chamber serve different functions, with primary combustion zones optimized for destruction and secondary zones for completing combustion while minimizing NOx formation through controlled oxygen availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves efficient combustion of over 99% of flammable gases with minimal NOx production, can remain in standby for extended periods and quickly restart, and operates efficiently across varying weather conditions, ensuring reliable destruction of flammable gases.

Implementation Method 1

burner arrangement that includes primary and secondary air circuits with regulators, and a control system to monitor and adjust airflow and waste gas composition, ensuring efficient combustion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

weatherproof protective hood arrangement, a burner arrangement that includes primary and secondary air circuits with regulators

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical barrier protection: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentUS9464804B2Gas flare system and method of destroying a flammable gas in a waste gas stream
Publication Date: 2016.10.11 RTJ TECH
  • US9464804B2 patent drawing
  • US9464804B2 patent drawing
  • US9464804B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The gas flare system includes a vertical flare stack having an opened top end and a bottom floor wall. A weatherproof protective hood arrangement prevents rain and snow from entering through the opened top end. The gas flare system also includes a burner arrangement provided through the bottom floor wall. The burner arrangement receives a waste gas stream from a waste gas circuit and also primary air. Secondary air orifices around the burner supply secondary air coming from a plenum housing located directly underneath the bottom floor wall. The gas flare system can destroy the flammable gas in the waste gas stream with a combustion efficiency of more than 99% under almost any operating conditions. It can start automatically and operate efficiently without any supervision under any possible atmospheric conditions. A method of destroying a flammable gas in a waste gas stream is also disclosed.