Flash Calcination of Zeolitic Materials via Atomization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current calcination processes for zeolitic materials are inefficient in terms of time and capacity, particularly for industrial-scale treatments, and often result in structural deterioration and prolonged exposure to high temperatures, which can affect crystallinity and template removal efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the atomization of zeolitic materials into a gas stream followed by extremely short calcination at high temperatures, maintaining high crystallinity and effective organotemplate removal without substantial structural deterioration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If conventional calcination in rotary ovens is used, then complete organotemplate removal is achieved, but retention time is excessively long (20-45 minutes) and processing efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalcination retention timeVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical rotary oven system with a fluidized bed reactor system, where hot gas flow suspends and vigorously mixes the zeolite particles. This substitution of mechanical heating with fluidized bed aeration enables rapid heat and mass transfer, reducing calcination time from 20-45 minutes to significantly shorter durations while maintaining complete organotemplate removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the calcination parameters by using higher temperatures (up to 900-1000°C) combined with controlled oxygen concentrations (1-50% O2 in inert gas) and extended fluidized bed aeration times (1-24 hours). These parameter modifications enable complete template removal while avoiding the structural deterioration that occurs in conventional lower-temperature, longer-duration calcination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If higher calcination temperatures are used to reduce time, then processing speed increases, but structural deterioration and loss of crystallinity occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalcination speedVSAvoidcrystallinity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs an inert gas atmosphere (nitrogen, argon, or carbon dioxide) containing controlled amounts of oxygen (1-50% v/v) during fluidized bed calcination. This modified inert environment allows rapid heating to high temperatures (900-1000°C) without causing excessive oxidative damage to the zeolite framework, thereby maintaining crystallinity while achieving fast template removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous fluidized bed calcination where inert gas flows continuously through the suspended zeolite particles, providing sustained oxygen supply for complete organotemplate combustion. This continuous action ensures thorough template removal even at high temperatures, preventing structural deterioration while maintaining processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If prolonged heating is applied to ensure complete template removal, then organotemplate elimination is thorough, but energy consumption increases and processing time is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemplate removal completenessVSAvoidcalcination energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses elevated temperatures (900-1000°C) combined with controlled oxygen concentrations (1-50% in inert gas) during fluidized bed calcination. These parameter changes accelerate the template combustion kinetics, enabling complete organotemplate removal in 1-24 hours instead of the 20-45 minutes in conventional rotary ovens, thereby reducing total energy consumption despite the higher instantaneous temperature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the inefficient mechanical heating of rotary ovens with fluidized bed aeration, where continuous gas flow provides both heating and oxygen supply for template combustion. This substitution creates a more efficient energy utilization system that achieves complete template removal with lower total energy input by maintaining optimal combustion conditions throughout the particle bed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process achieves efficient calcination with high crystallinity and significant organotemplate removal in extremely short retention times, optimizing calcination conditions to avoid structural damage and enhance template removal, contrasting with conventional methods that require longer heating times.

Implementation Method 1

contacting the aerosol with a hot gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection heating: Convection

Implementation Method 2

the calcination further leads to the thermal decomposition and/or combustion of such organic compounds trapped within the zeolitic framework

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

this may be performed in an oxidizing environment wherein calcination is typically performed under air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS11542170B2Process for the flash calcination of a zeolitic material
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 BASF SE

AI summary

The present invention relates to a process for the calcination of a zeolitic material, wherein said process comprises the steps of(i) providing a zeolitic material comprising YO2 and optionally further comprising X2O3 in its framework structure in the form of a powder and/or of a suspension of the zeolitic material in a liquid, wherein Y stands for a tetravalent element and X stands for a trivalent element;(ii) atomization of the powder and/or of the suspension of the zeolitic material provided in (i) in a gas stream for obtaining an aerosol;(iii) calcination of the aerosol obtained in (ii) for obtaining a calcined powder;as well as to a zeolitic material obtainable and/or obtained according the inventive process, and to its use as a molecular sieve, as an adsorbent, for ion-exchange, as a catalyst, and/or as a catalyst support.