Flash Memory Page Buffer Parameter Tuning for Noise Robustness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Miniaturization of flash memory cells and transistors makes them more susceptible to noise, affecting the reliability and accuracy of semiconductor devices.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device with a circuit design system that includes a processor and memory, which performs circuit simulations on a flash memory device with a page buffer, adjusts transistor and voltage parameters based on reward calculations to optimize performance and robustness against noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If memory cells and transistors are miniaturized to increase storage capacity, then storage density is improved, but noise susceptibility increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage densityVSAvoidnoise susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by adjusting transistor dimensions (channel width W and length L), voltage levels (read voltage VRD, pass voltage VPD), and current thresholds to optimize the balance between storage density and noise immunity. The reinforcement learning system iteratively modifies these parameters to maximize noise robustness while maintaining miniaturization benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through reinforcement learning where the system performs circuit simulations, evaluates noise susceptibility based on simulation results, and uses the evaluation (reward) to adjust parameters for subsequent simulations. This closed-loop feedback enables continuous optimization of the circuit design to achieve better noise immunity without sacrificing storage density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If transistor dimensions are reduced to increase integration, then manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration densityVSAvoidtransistor dimension control
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes to compensate for manufacturing variations by adjusting operational parameters (voltages, currents, timing) based on simulated performance. The reinforcement learning system identifies optimal parameter combinations that maintain circuit functionality despite variations in physical transistor dimensions, effectively decoupling integration density from manufacturing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the circuit parameters adaptive rather than fixed. The reinforcement learning process dynamically adjusts transistor dimensions, voltage levels, and timing parameters based on simulated noise conditions and performance metrics, enabling the design to accommodate manufacturing tolerances while maintaining optimal integration density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If circuit parameters are optimized for noise resistance, then reliability is improved, but design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise resistanceVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service through automated reinforcement learning that performs circuit simulations, evaluates performance, and adjusts parameters autonomously. The system serves itself by using its own computational resources to optimize the design, eliminating the need for manual iterative design processes and reducing overall design complexity despite the sophisticated optimization being performed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical design processes with computational automation. Instead of physically prototyping and testing circuits, the system uses computer-based reinforcement learning and circuit simulation to optimize parameters, substituting physical iteration with virtual optimization that achieves better reliability without proportionally increasing design complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240371445A1Electronic device for manufacturing of semiconductor device and operating method of electronic device
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20240371445A1 patent drawing
  • US20240371445A1 patent drawing
  • US20240371445A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An operating method of a circuit design system which includes a processor and a memory includes reading, at the processor, a circuit layout of a flash memory device including a page buffer from the memory, initializing, at the processor, a value of a first parameter of at least one transistor of the page buffer and a value of a second parameter of at least one voltage applied to the page buffer, performing, at the processor, circuit simulation on the page buffer using the initialized first and second parameters, and calculating, at the processor, a reward based on a result of the circuit simulation. The processor is configured to perform, in response to the reward being not greater than a threshold value, a subsequent action. The subsequent action includes adjust the value of the first parameter of the at least one transistor and the value of the second parameter of the at least one voltage, and perform subsequent circuit simulation on the page buffer using the adjusted first and second parameters.