Flash Memory Read Level Grouping for MLC Endurance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-level cell (MLC) flash memory devices used in SSDs face reliability and endurance issues due to increased stress during read, program, and erase operations, leading to degradation, especially in enterprise applications where higher data capacity is needed but at a higher cost.

Innovation Solution

The method involves dividing flash memory wordlines into groups based on read error counts and normalized read level offsets, storing these associations to optimize read operations, thereby reducing bit error rates and improving endurance by using offset voltage pairs for consecutive wordlines in a flash memory block.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If MLC flash memory is used to increase data capacity, then storage capacity is improved, but reliability and endurance deteriorate due to increased stress during read, program, and erase operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata capacityVSAvoidreliability and endurance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the flash memory array into multiple tiers or zones based on wear characteristics. Frequently accessed data is moved to a smaller SLC cache portion, while less frequently accessed data resides in the larger MLC portion. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high data capacity in MLC while protecting reliability by isolating high-stress operations to the more durable SLC portion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different quality characteristics to different portions of the storage system. The SLC cache portion is optimized for high endurance and fast operations, while the MLC portion is optimized for high capacity and cost-effectiveness. This local quality differentiation allows each portion to perform its specific function optimally without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If wear-leveling algorithms are employed to mitigate reliability problems, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wear-leveling algorithm is simplified by segmenting the storage space into distinct SLC and MLC portions with different wear characteristics. This allows the controller to apply different wear-leveling strategies to each portion, reducing the overall complexity compared to managing a uniform storage space. The SLC cache requires aggressive wear-leveling while the MLC portion can use more relaxed strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the wear-leveling algorithm by introducing tier-specific parameters. Different wear thresholds, relocation frequencies, and allocation policies are applied to SLC and MLC portions. This parameter differentiation simplifies the algorithm by making it adaptive to the specific characteristics of each storage tier rather than requiring a single complex universal algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If read level offsets are normalized for best error rate, then bit error rate is reduced, but storage of offset associations increases memory requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebit error rateVSAvoidmemory for offset storage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple offset associations into fewer representative offsets by grouping wordlines with similar read characteristics. Instead of storing individual offsets for each wordline, wordlines are clustered into groups with similar electrical characteristics, and a single offset is stored per group. This merging significantly reduces the memory required for offset storage while maintaining effective error rate reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the granularity parameter of offset storage from wordline-level to group-level. By adjusting this parameter, the system can trade off between precision (more offsets) and memory efficiency (fewer offsets). The optimal grouping size is determined based on the correlation of read characteristics across adjacent wordlines, achieving the best balance between error reduction and memory consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9905302B2Read level grouping algorithms for increased flash performance
Publication Date: 2018.02.27 WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US9905302B2 patent drawing
  • US9905302B2 patent drawing
  • US9905302B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plurality of flash memory wordlines of a flash storage device are divided into a plurality of wordline groups based on read error counts associated with the wordlines and a plurality of read level offsets. Each wordline group is associated with one of a plurality of read level offsets determined while dividing the plurality of flash memory wordlines, and associations between the plurality of read level offsets and the plurality of wordline groups are stored for use in connection with read levels to read the flash memory wordlines of the respective wordline groups.