Flat Child Restraint Belt Housing With Auto-Locking Tension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing restraint belt devices for children are not ergonomic, can be uncomfortable, prone to loosening, and may cause damage or interfere with stroller folding due to bulky designs and lack of secure fixation.

Innovation Solution

A flat, deformable seat belt device with a housing that automatically tensions the belt upon buckle engagement, preventing loosening and allowing adjustable length without protruding significantly, enabling secure child restraint and space-saving storage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a wide belt is used to improve child comfort and security, then the restraining effect is improved, but the housing volume increases and interferes with stroller folding and stacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild restraint securityVSAvoidhousing volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The belt is routed through a channel that runs laterally underneath the seat bottom rather than through a vertical housing structure. This lateral routing in the horizontal dimension allows the belt to be wide enough for comfort and security while keeping the housing profile low and compact, enabling stroller folding and stacking without interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The housing is designed with a thin, flat profile that accommodates the belt mechanism without significant protrusion. The belt itself uses a flat belt construction that provides comfortable contact with the child while maintaining a sleek overall device profile suitable for compact storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Ease of operation

If a spring mechanism is used to automatically tension the belt, then ease of operation is improved, but the belt can still be loosened by the child pulling on it

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic belt tensioningVSAvoidbelt security against child manipulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The spring tensioning mechanism is extracted and housed separately in a housing attached to the seat bottom, distinct from the belt routing path. The belt runs through a channel underneath the seat, separating the tensioning function from the restraint function, so that when the belt is pulled, it engages the locking mechanism rather than simply releasing spring tension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The belt system incorporates a locking mechanism that prevents the belt from being loosened by child manipulation. The preliminary design includes a cable pull mechanism or similar locking feature that blocks belt movement once engaged, countering any subsequent attempts by the child to pull or loosen the belt.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Device complexity

If the belt is routed through a channel under the seat bottom, then the belt path is simplified, but it interferes with shopping trolley usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebelt routing simplicityVSAvoidcompatibility with shopping trolley
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The channel is positioned and designed to accommodate the belt routing locally underneath the seat bottom, with the belt emerging at specific points that do not interfere with shopping trolley attachment points. The local configuration of the channel and belt emergence points allows simplified routing while maintaining compatibility with external attachments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If the housing and mechanism are made deformable, then adaptability to collapsible strollers is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with collapsible strollerVSAvoidhousing manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The housing and mechanism are designed with deformable or flexible characteristics that allow them to adapt to the collapsing and expanding movements of foldable stroller frames. The housing can be made from flexible materials or designed with movable components that accommodate structural changes without requiring complex assembly or disassembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures secure child restraint without discomfort, prevents belt damage, and allows for easy stacking and folding of strollers by maintaining a compact design.

Implementation Method 1

An elastic element is provided which tensions the belt and pulls the belt into the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic element: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the belt is blocked via a cable pull mechanism when the buckle attached to the free end of the belt is pushed into the lock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCable pull mechanism: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP2242400B1Restraint device for children
Publication Date: 2013.05.22 SONNENDORFER HORST
  • EP2242400B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2242400B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2242400B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A flat housing (1) holds a belt (4) which can be extended against the force of a spring, the belt being blocked to further extension as soon as the belt clasp (3) is situated in the belt buckle.