Flat Pack Modular Panels for Construction Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current construction methods are inefficient, leading to long build times, waste, and high carbon emissions, with limited design flexibility and increased risk of injuries due to heavy machinery reliance and worker fatigue.

Innovation Solution

A panelized, systems-based approach using structurally insulated panels with proprietary connectors and a digital design toolkit for prefabricated building construction, reducing material waste, carbon emissions, and worker fatigue, while allowing for easier assembly and customization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional construction methods are used, then construction can be completed using conventional techniques, but build times are long and worker fatigue increases leading to higher injury risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction speedVSAvoidworker injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The building is divided into modular panels that are pre-assembled in controlled factory environments and then transported to the construction site for rapid assembly. This segmentation allows construction work to be performed in safer, controlled conditions rather than traditional on-site assembly, reducing worker exposure to hazardous conditions while accelerating the construction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Building components are pre-assembled and pre-inspected in factory settings before delivery to the construction site. This preliminary action ensures quality control and safety inspections are completed in controlled environments, reducing the need for high-risk on-site work and accelerating the overall construction timeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If block module prefabricated housing is used, then some prefabrication benefits are achieved, but design flexibility is limited and heavy machinery is required for installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidheavy machinery requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses smaller, more manageable panel segments rather than large block modules. These segmented panels can be easily maneuvered and assembled without heavy machinery, while their modular nature provides extensive design flexibility for various building configurations and styles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The panels are designed to be assembled in a flat-pack configuration that can be easily transported and then erected vertically. This dimensional transformation allows for simplified logistics and eliminates the need for heavy lifting equipment, while the modular panel system provides versatile design options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If block module prefabricated housing is used, then volumetric modules are shipped, but shipping costs increase and installation requires heavy machinery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel assembly easeVSAvoidshipping cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The panel system is designed to be disassembled into flat, nested components that can be efficiently stacked and transported. This nesting approach maximizes space utilization during shipping, reducing the quantity of substance (transport volume) required compared to shipping complete volumetric modules, while maintaining ease of on-site assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Loss of substance

If traditional construction methods are used, then construction practices remain unchanged, but material waste increases and environmental impact is negative

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial wasteVSAvoidconstruction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Building components are precisely cut and pre-assembled in factory settings using computer-controlled machinery before delivery to the construction site. This preliminary action ensures optimal material utilization and minimizes waste generation, while the pre-fabricated components are ready for rapid on-site assembly, maintaining high construction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The modular panel system is designed for potential disassembly and material recovery at the end of the building's lifecycle. Panels can be taken apart and materials recovered for reuse or recycling, reducing overall material waste and environmental impact compared to traditional construction methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS20240044124A1System and Method for On-Site Construction Using Prefabricated Components
Publication Date: 2024.02.08 INNOVATE PREFABRICATE INC
  • US20240044124A1 patent drawing
  • US20240044124A1 patent drawing
  • US20240044124A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A panelized, systems-based, holistic approach towards design, manufacturing and construction is disclosed. In an exemplary system, a core structural metal framing known as stud and track structure refers to the construction of walls and planes using cold-formed steel. The metal framing has two main components, a stud and a track. The disclosed system is a flat pack. A flat pack system is a prefabricated building construction system that uses structurally insulated panels which are prefabricated in a factory, shipped by stacking and assembled on site. The modular panel system is manufactured off-site and includes an exterior facade, insulation and interior walls in a single pre-made modular panel system, which is connected via novel connectors.