Flat textile substrate with at least partial fire protection coating, method for its production and uses thereof

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There are no known flat textile substrates that meet the requirements of fire class A2 according to DIN EN 13501-2010-01, necessitating a solution for enhanced fire protection.

Innovation Solution

A flat textile substrate with a coating comprising a starch-based binder, inorganic flame retardants (such as aluminum and magnesium oxides), phosphorus or phosphorus-nitrogen based flame retardants, and a plastic-based binder, applied in specific weight proportions and dried to achieve excellent flame retardant properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional flame retardant treatments are applied to textile substrates, then flame retardant properties are improved, but fire class A2 requirements are not met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame retardant propertiesVSAvoidfire class classification
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining multiple flame retardant substances (phosphorus-based, phosphorus-nitrogen-based, and inorganic flame retardants) with specific binders (starch-based and plastic-based binders) to create a coating composition that achieves fire class A2. This composite approach allows the synergistic interaction of different flame retardant mechanisms while maintaining coating integrity and adhesion to the textile substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by precisely controlling the weight ratios of components in the coating composition (0.5-10% starch-based binder, 10-50% inorganic flame retardant, 0.5-20% phosphorus-based flame retardant, 1-20% plastic-based binder) and optimizing application parameters (coating weight, drying conditions) to achieve the specific fire class A2 performance requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple flame retardant components are combined to achieve fire class A2, then flame retardant effectiveness is improved, but coating composition complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire protection performanceVSAvoidcoating composition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple flame retardant components and binder systems into a single integrated coating composition that can be applied in one step. The combination of starch-based and plastic-based binders with multiple flame retardant types creates a unified system that simplifies the application process while achieving superior fire protection performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves homogeneity by formulating a uniform coating composition where all components (binders, flame retardants, and additives) are distributed evenly throughout the aqueous medium. This homogeneous mixture ensures consistent flame retardant performance across the entire textile substrate surface and simplifies the coating application process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

3Reliability

If inorganic flame retardants are used in high concentrations, then flame retardant properties are improved, but coating weight and potential stiffness increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame retardant effectivenessVSAvoidcoating weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the concentration parameter of inorganic flame retardants within the specific range of 10-50% by weight, balancing flame retardant effectiveness with coating weight considerations. This parameter optimization ensures sufficient fire protection while avoiding excessive weight gain and potential stiffness issues that would result from higher concentrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by combining inorganic flame retardants with organic binders (starch-based and plastic-based) to create a balanced coating system. The binders provide flexibility and adhesion while the inorganic flame retardants provide fire protection, achieving a harmonious balance between weight, flexibility, and flame retardant effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The substrate meets fire class A2 criteria, demonstrating superior flame retardant properties and potential use in applications like wallpaper due to its excellent fire protection.

Implementation Method 1

a starch-based binder containing or consisting of starch and/or a starch derivative

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

a plastic-based binder that contains or consists of at least one plastic

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

wherein the flame retardant coating is applied to at least one surface of a textile substrate and is then dried

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentEP3173390B1Flat textile substrate with at least partial fire protection coating, method for its production and uses thereof
Publication Date: 2021.03.24 VITRULAN TEXTILE GLASS GMBH

AI summary

According to the invention, a flat textile substrate with an at least regional flame retardant coating and a method for its production are provided. The coating of the flat textile substrate contains firstly an inorganic flame retardant based on magnesium, aluminum and/or ammonium and secondly a flame retardant based on phosphorus or phosphorus-nitrogen. The coating also contains a starch-based binder. Surprisingly, it was found that the flat textile substrate according to the invention can be classified in fire class A2 according to DIN EN 13501-1:2010-01. Based on the excellent fire protection properties, the use of the flat textile substrate as wallpaper is proposed, among other things.