Flatbed Cutter Assembly Bridge-Free Cutting Method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flatbed cutter assemblies face challenges in cutting rigid media without chipping printed marking material and aligning front and back images, especially when using bridges, which either result in material loss or time-consuming alignment processes.

Innovation Solution

A flatbed cutter assembly with a controller that cuts through the medium from front to back along a cut path, except for partial bridges, and then reverses the process after flipping the medium, cutting less than half its thickness at bridge locations to maintain alignment and prevent material chipping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the recording medium is cut through from front to back along the cut path, then the cutting process is simple and fast, but the printed marking material chips off during cutting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting speedVSAvoidmarking material chipping
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting process is divided into multiple stages: first cutting from the front side to a depth less than half the thickness, then flipping the medium, and completing the cut from the back side. This segmentation allows the cut to proceed without chipping marking material while maintaining overall cutting efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The front side cut is performed as a preliminary action before flipping the medium. This initial cut creates a guide groove that prevents marking material chipping during the subsequent back side cut, while still allowing relatively fast cutting compared to other methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If bridges are used to hold front and back images together for alignment, then alignment is easy, but printed marking material chips near the bridges when the piece is extracted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment easeVSAvoidmarking material chipping near bridges
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful effect of bridge-induced chipping is eliminated by removing the traditional bridge structure entirely. Instead, the method uses partial cuts through the medium that eliminate the need for bridges, thereby preventing marking material chipping while still allowing accurate alignment through the cut path itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the recording medium is cut first and then printed on both sides, then marking material chipping is avoided, but aligning front and back images becomes time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking material chipping avoidanceVSAvoidalignment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting process is segmented into front side and back side operations with a flip in between, allowing printing to be performed on both sides while the medium remains aligned on the table. This eliminates time-consuming alignment operations while preventing marking material chipping through the controlled cutting depth approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cut path itself serves as the alignment reference for both front and back printing operations. By maintaining the medium's position on the table during the flip and re-cutting process, the system uses the cutting mechanism itself to ensure alignment rather than requiring separate alignment operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Stability of the object's composition

If partial bridges are used to hold the printed piece together during flipping, then alignment is maintained, but some cutting depth is required at bridge locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinted piece integrityVSAvoidcutting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The traditional bridge structure is completely removed and replaced with a flip-based approach. The medium is held stable during flipping by the partial front side cut and the table edge, eliminating the need for additional cutting at bridge locations and simplifying the overall process while maintaining printed piece integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10152990B2Flatbed cutter assembly and a method therefor
Publication Date: 2018.12.11 OCE HLDG BV
  • US10152990B2 patent drawing
  • US10152990B2 patent drawing
  • US10152990B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flatbed cutter assembly includes a medium support table for supporting a recording medium, the table extending in a first direction and a second direction, the first direction being perpendicular to the second direction, a gantry arranged to be moveable over the medium support table in the first direction, a carriage support movably arranged on the gantry to move over the medium support table in the second direction, a cutter configured to be coupled to the carriage support and a controller for controlling the movements of the gantry, the carriage support and the cutter while moving over the medium support table. The controller is configured to cut through the recording medium from the front side to the back side along a cut path except for a plurality of bridges along the cut path, the recording medium intended to be printed on both front and back side of the recording medium, wherein parts of each bridge which are intended to be adjacent to printed images on the front and back side of the recording medium, are removed by the cutter.