Flattened Container Base Structure for Stability and Blowability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flat containers made of plastic, such as PET, face instability due to their flattened shape, which compromises ergonomics and stability, and are prone to shape defects from poor blowability, while increasing energy consumption and cycle time constraints.

Innovation Solution

A plastic container design with a base featuring a peripheral annular laying plane, a concave vault, and an internal annular cheek, dimensioned to provide stability and airflow, with specific dimensions for the width and height of the base components to minimize material stretching and enhance rigidity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the container is flattened to improve ergonomics and grip, then ease of handling is improved, but stability deteriorates due to increased tipping risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of handlingVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The base is segmented into multiple functional zones: a laying plane for stability, a concave vault for structural rigidity, and an internal annular cheek with variable width to reinforce the minor axis direction. This segmentation allows each zone to address specific stability requirements while maintaining the flattened ergonomic shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The internal annular cheek has asymmetric dimensions with width C along the major axis and width C' along the minor axis, where C' < C. This asymmetric design provides targeted reinforcement in the minor axis direction where tipping risk is highest, while maintaining the overall flattened ergonomic profile for good grip.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Manufacturing precision

If blowing pressure is increased to improve mold impression and reduce shape defects, then manufacturing precision is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold impression qualityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The base geometry parameters are optimized to facilitate blow molding: the concave vault shape and variable width cheek design allow material to flow and conform to the mold more efficiently at lower pressures, reducing the blowing pressure needed while maintaining good mold impression quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If blowing time is increased to improve mold impression, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to increased cycle time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold impression qualityVSAvoidproduction rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The base geometry is designed with optimized thickness distribution and flow paths that enable rapid material conforming to the mold at reduced blowing times. The concave vault and cheek structure facilitate efficient material flow, achieving good mold impression quality with shorter cycle times for increased productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Stability of the object's composition

If the base width is increased to improve stability, then stability is improved, but rigidity in the minor axis direction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidrigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The internal annular cheek has different widths in different directions: width C along the major axis and width C' along the minor axis, with C' < C. This asymmetric reinforcement provides targeted structural support in the minor axis direction where rigidity is most needed, while the overall larger base width maintains stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The concave vault shape distributes structural stresses more effectively than a flat base, providing enhanced rigidity in the minor axis direction without requiring excessive base width. The curved geometry creates natural structural reinforcement that improves both stability and rigidity simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentEP4464613B1Flattened container comprising an arched bottom having a seat portion with variable width
Publication Date: 2026.02.11 SIDEL PARTICIPATIONS SAS
  • EP4464613B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4464613B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4464613B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Plastic container (1), having a flattened body (2) and a base (3) extending from the body (2) at one lower end thereof, the base (3) comprising: - a peripheral base (7) defining an annular seating plane (8) whose contour has, along a major axis, a major dimension A and, along a minor axis perpendicular to the major axis, a minor dimension A' strictly less than the major dimension, this base having: o along the major axis, a width C such that: 0.03≤CA≤0.1 o along the minor axis, a width C' such that: 0.05≤C′A′≤0.15 - a concave vault (13) extending from the base (7) towards a central zone (14); - the base (7) has, between the laying plane (8) and the vault (13), an internal annular cheek (10) substantially perpendicular to the laying plane (8); - the base (7) includes a step (11') forming a step at the junction between the laying plane (8) and the cheek (10).