Flattened Steer Tube Bicycle Fork for Cable Routing Space

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern bicycles with slim designs face space constraints in the head tube for arranging shift cables, hydraulic lines, and wires due to limited dimensions, making it difficult to accommodate these components effectively.

Innovation Solution

A bicycle fork with a steer tube featuring longitudinal flattenings and a non-circular cross-section, allowing for an enlarged cavity within the head tube to house these components, and a cover cap with lead-through openings and seals to ensure secure installation and protection against humidity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If the head tube dimensions are reduced for a slim bicycle design, then the aesthetic appearance and aerodynamics are improved, but the available space for arranging shift cables, hydraulic lines, and wires is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead tube dimensionsVSAvoidinstallation space in head tube
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The steer tube cross-section is changed from circular to non-circular (flattened) shape, utilizing dimensional transformation to create additional installation space within the same head tube envelope. The flattening creates a larger internal cavity while maintaining external compatibility with the head tube dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The geometric parameters of the steer tube are modified by introducing flattenings that extend in the longitudinal direction, changing the cross-sectional shape to maximize the available space for cable routing while keeping the outer dimensions constrained by the head tube.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If the steer tube has a circular cross-section, then the structural strength and manufacturing simplicity are maintained, but the cavity space for arranging cables and lines is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteer tube structural strengthVSAvoidcavity volume in steer tube
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The steer tube is designed with non-uniform cross-section, featuring flattenings in specific regions where cable routing is needed, while maintaining circular cross-section in other regions where structural strength is prioritized. This localized modification optimizes both strength and cable installation space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The steer tube cross-section is changed from symmetric circular shape to asymmetric flattened shape, creating uneven distribution of material that maximizes the internal cavity space while maintaining sufficient structural integrity through strategic placement of the flattenings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS12441424B2Bicycle fork and bicycle fork system
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 CANYON BICYCLES
  • US12441424B2 patent drawing
  • US12441424B2 patent drawing
  • US12441424B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bicycle fork including two fork legs connected with each other via a fork bridge. The fork bridge is connected with a steer tube. For a simpler arrangement of shift cables, hydraulic lines, cables and the like, the steer tube includes at least one flattening extending in the longitudinal direction of the steer shaft.