Connected Vehicle Fleet Control With Safety Verification Layer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle fleet cooperative control systems face issues such as time delays, data packet loss, and out-of-order transmissions leading to vehicle instability and frequent acceleration/deceleration, which can result in accidents, especially when interacting with other road participants.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent cooperative control system that integrates environment perception, vehicle status monitoring, and communication modules to fuse information, perform safety verification, and execute either vehicle motion or safety control instructions based on risk assessment, ensuring vehicle safety and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If direct vehicle-to-vehicle communication is used for fleet cooperative control, then communication efficiency and response speed are improved, but communication reliability deteriorates due to time delay, data packet loss, and out-of-order transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a safety verification module as an intermediary between the cooperative control module and execution module. This mediator receives control instructions, verifies their safety against pre-established safety rules and real-time environmental data, and only permits execution of safe instructions. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining fast direct communication while adding a safety layer that filters out unreliable or dangerous instructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary safety verification of control instructions before they are executed. By pre-establishing safety rules, spatial-temporal safety distances, and verification mechanisms, the system proactively identifies and blocks potentially dangerous instructions before they can cause harm. This preliminary action ensures communication reliability without sacrificing response speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If cooperative control instructions are executed directly without verification, then fleet coordination efficiency is improved, but safety deteriorates due to accumulated following errors and potential accidents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefleet coordination efficiencyVSAvoidtraffic accident risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The safety verification module continuously monitors control instructions against real-time environmental perception data, vehicle status information, and pre-established safety rules. This feedback mechanism compares intended actions with safe operating boundaries and blocks instructions that would violate safety constraints. The system maintains high coordination efficiency by only blocking genuinely dangerous instructions while permitting safe ones to execute.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by pre-defining safety rules, spatial-temporal safety distances, and verification criteria before cooperative control operations begin. These pre-established constraints act as preventive measures that automatically counteract potentially harmful control instructions before they can cause accumulated errors or accidents, thereby protecting against harmful factors while maintaining coordination efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If safety verification module is added to verify control instructions, then safety is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control system into distinct functional modules: environment perception module, vehicle status monitoring module, cooperative control module, safety verification module, and execution module. Each module has a specific responsibility, with the safety verification module acting as a dedicated safety layer. This segmentation improves safety through specialized verification while managing complexity by localizing safety functions to a dedicated module rather than distributing complexity throughout the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12613525B2Intelligent cooperative control method and system for connected vehicle fleet, electronic device and storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.04.28 BLACK SESAME TECH (CHONGQING) CO LTD
  • US12613525B2 patent drawing
  • US12613525B2 patent drawing
  • US12613525B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are an intelligent cooperative control method and system for a coupled vehicle fleet, an electronic device and a storage medium. The method includes: acquiring environment perception information and/or vehicle status information; calculating a vehicle safety control instruction based on the environment perception information and/or the vehicle status information; acquiring a vehicle fleet cooperative control instruction sent by a vehicle; calculating a vehicle motion control instruction based on the vehicle fleet cooperative control instruction and/or the vehicle status information; and controlling the vehicle in response to the vehicle safety control instruction and the vehicle motion control instruction. An intelligent cooperative control method and system for a coupled vehicle fleet, an electronic device and a storage medium provided in the present disclosure may effectively improve the stability of vehicle fleet and the safety of the system.