Fleet Dispatch Optimization for Worksites

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to determine the optimal number of machines and dispatch scheme for a worksite to efficiently meet time and cost goals for tasks such as material delivery, as they primarily focus on single vehicle routes and do not consider overall fleet deployment.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine a time-cost goal for a job, evaluate candidate fleet sizes and dispatch schemes, and select the combination that best satisfies this goal by simulating machine operations and calculating projected job performance times and costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple candidate fleet sizes and dispatch schemes are evaluated to meet time-cost goals, then job performance optimization is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejob performanceVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation process into distinct phases: generating candidate fleet sizes, generating candidate dispatch schemes, simulating machine operations, and evaluating time-cost goals. This segmentation allows the complex optimization problem to be broken down into manageable computational steps, improving tractability while maintaining comprehensive evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-generating candidate fleet sizes and candidate dispatch schemes before the actual evaluation. This preliminary generation of options allows the system to systematically assess multiple scenarios without computational overload during the final selection phase, as the candidate sets are prepared in advance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If simulated machine operations are performed for individual combinations of fleet sizes and dispatch schemes, then accurate job performance prediction is improved, but computational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejob performance prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by evaluating only individual combinations of candidate fleet sizes and dispatch schemes rather than all possible combinations simultaneously. The system selectively simulates machine operations for specific combinations based on the time-cost goal, performing sufficient evaluation to achieve accurate prediction without the excessive computational burden of exhaustive analysis of every possible scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240086801A1Fleet size and dispatch scheme optimization
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US20240086801A1 patent drawing
  • US20240086801A1 patent drawing
  • US20240086801A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A job at a worksite can be performed by different numbers of machines, and machines can be deployed to perform the job according to different dispatch schemes. A computing system can use job design data and other job parameters associated with the job to determine projected job performance times and costs associated with different combinations of candidate fleet sizes and candidate dispatch schemes. The computing system can identify a particular fleet size and dispatch scheme combination, among the possible fleet size and dispatch scheme combinations, that is associated with a projected job performance time and a projected job cost that best satisfies a time-cost goal for the job.