Fleet Fuel Savings Identification via Modifiable Use Condition Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fleet vehicle management systems fail to effectively identify and address modifiable use conditions that lead to inefficient fuel consumption, resulting in increased costs and environmental impact due to unauthorized use, improper vehicle maintenance, and suboptimal routing and scheduling.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that analyze operational data from individual vehicles within a fleet to identify modifiable use conditions such as excessive speed, idling, improper tire pressure, and suboptimal routing, allowing for the calculation of potential fuel savings and implementation of adjustments to reduce fuel consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If fleet vehicles are monitored and analyzed to identify modifiable use conditions, then fuel savings opportunities can be identified, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fleet management problem into distinct modifiable use conditions (speed, idling, routing, scheduling, maintenance) and analyzes each separately. This allows targeted identification of fuel savings opportunities without requiring complete system redesign, thereby reducing overall complexity while improving energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring vehicle operational data and comparing it against optimal parameters. This feedback loop enables automatic identification of deviations from efficient operation patterns, allowing the system to adapt and improve fuel efficiency without manual intervention, thus managing complexity through automated self-regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If detailed operational data is collected and analyzed for each vehicle, then precise fuel savings opportunities can be identified, but data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining optimal parameter ranges and thresholds for various operational conditions (speed limits, idling thresholds, routing criteria). This preparation allows rapid comparison against actual vehicle data without requiring complex real-time calculations, thereby maintaining high identification accuracy while minimizing data processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by focusing analysis on specific critical parameters (speed, idling duration, route deviation, maintenance intervals) rather than processing all possible vehicle data. This selective parameter approach maintains measurement precision for key fuel efficiency factors while significantly reducing overall data processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If fleet management systems implement comprehensive monitoring of use conditions, then fuel consumption can be reduced, but implementation costs and operational disruption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidimplementation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing vehicle operators to receive immediate feedback about their driving patterns and automatically adjust their behavior to improve fuel efficiency. The system identifies modifiable use conditions and communicates them to operators, who can then make voluntary adjustments without mandatory system changes, reducing implementation costs and operational disruption while still achieving fuel savings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of energy

If vehicle routing and scheduling are optimized to reduce fuel consumption, then fuel efficiency improves, but delivery times and service quality may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidservice efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by creating flexible routing and scheduling solutions that can adapt to changing conditions. Rather than implementing rigid optimized routes, the system provides dynamic guidance that adjusts to traffic conditions, vehicle locations, and service requirements in real-time. This allows fuel efficiency improvements while maintaining service quality and productivity through adaptive rather than static optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7877198B2System and method for identifying fuel savings opportunity in vehicles
Publication Date: 2011.01.25 TRANSPORTATION IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • US7877198B2 patent drawing
  • US7877198B2 patent drawing
  • US7877198B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method of identify fuel savings opportunity in a fleet of vehicles based on a determination of fuel consumption due to modifiable use conditions is described. Modifiable use conditions, such as unauthorized usage, speeding and excessive idling, which represent opportunities for fuel savings are identified and fuel consumption based on the modifiable use conditions is determined. A user-defined statistical metric for the fleet, or a portion of the fleet, can be determined for each of the modifiable use conditions evaluated. Fuel consumption of an individual vehicle, or a group of vehicles, resulting from modifiable use conditions can be compared with a larger group of vehicle, or the fleet, to determine vehicles which correspond to a metric of the fleet. Fleet managers can use this information to modify the use conditions of individual or group of vehicles to provide fuel savings for the fleet.