Fleet Service Interface for Real-Time Task Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fleet management systems lack the ability to utilize real-time data for dynamic service scheduling, making it labor-intensive and inefficient to manage and service large fleets of shareable/rentable vehicles like scooters and bicycles in urban environments.

Innovation Solution

An automated platform that determines the status of each fleet vehicle, generates service tasks, assigns locations, and allocates users to perform these tasks based on proximity and user profiles, using machine learning models to predict demand and optimize navigation routes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional fleet management systems are used, then service scheduling is simple to implement, but productivity and efficiency are low due to labor-intensive manual management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice scheduling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated service task generation that monitors fleet vehicle status autonomously and creates service tasks without human intervention. The system self-manages the entire workflow from status detection to service assignment, eliminating manual labor and significantly improving productivity while the automated nature keeps complexity manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical service scheduling is replaced with an automated digital system that uses real-time data processing and machine learning algorithms. The system substitutes human operators with automated software that generates service tasks, assigns them to users, and optimizes routes, thereby improving efficiency without proportionally increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If real-time data collection and automated service scheduling are implemented, then productivity and efficiency improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefleet service productivityVSAvoidplatform complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fleet management platform performs multiple functions within a single integrated system: real-time status monitoring, service task generation, user assignment, route optimization, and progress tracking. This multi-functionality improves productivity by consolidating operations while managing complexity through unified architecture rather than separate systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments service tasks by type (e.g., battery service, tire service) and assigns them to specialized users based on task requirements and user profiles. This segmentation improves productivity by enabling specialized service delivery while managing complexity through modular task organization and targeted data processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If service tasks are assigned based on user proximity and profiles, then service quality improves, but computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice task assignment qualityVSAvoidassignment algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses machine learning models that analyze multiple parameters including user location, service task type, user availability, and historical performance data. By dynamically adjusting assignment decisions based on these parameters, the system improves service quality while managing complexity through algorithmic optimization rather than manual processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of time

If navigation routes are optimized using machine learning models, then time efficiency improves, but computational resources and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice task completion timeVSAvoidroute optimization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores optimal routes between service locations using machine learning models that analyze historical data and current conditions. By performing route optimization in advance and updating routes as needed, the system reduces actual service time while managing computational complexity through predictive analytics rather than real-time calculation during service execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12066835B2Fleet management user interface
Publication Date: 2024.08.20 LYFT INC
  • US12066835B2 patent drawing
  • US12066835B2 patent drawing
  • US12066835B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are disclosed for fleet vehicle management. According to various embodiments, a status is determined for each fleet vehicle of a plurality of fleet vehicles. Based on the status, a service task is determined for at least a subset of the plurality of fleet vehicles. A location is determined for each service task. A service task list is generated based on the service tasks and the locations of the service tasks. A user to perform the service task list is determined based on the service tasks and the service task locations. The service task is communicated to the user and progress of the service task list is monitored.